Morning edition, Saturday 14 November

The Nvidia board's case against Jensen Huang took a hit on Friday: Sacks tallied the DOJ, CIA and DNI on the spy allegation as "no conclusions reached"DavidSacks, while Balaji called for the anti-Jensen directors to gobalajis. The same day, zerohedge mapped what rests on Nvidia's balance sheetzerohedge and the board approached Arm's Rene Haaszerohedge. Microsoft's outage dragged on and took Claude's Microsoft 365 connector with itzerohedge, PPI landed at 6.5% with the 10-year past 5.14%zerohedge, and Bitcoin fell to its 200-week averageColeMacro. Don't miss Sacks's tally in the Huang story or the Goldman email-backup line in the Microsoft onezerohedge.

Continuing · earlier: Bitcoin slides toward $71k as Adam Back calls $1M by 2028

Bitcoin falls through $70k to its 200-week average; Schiff calls it a bear market

Bitcoin went on past the $71k touch from the earlier piece and fell back below $70kbenjamincowen, then to around $68k. _Checkonchain put the 200-week moving average at around $67.8k_checkonchain, and Matt Cole said it's historically one of the best timesColeMacro to add risk.

Peter Schiff came for the HODLers: Bitcoin just traded at a lower price than it traded in November 2021, and the long-term trend is downPeterSchiff. Undisclosed answered that anyone can cherry pick prior tops against bottoms, and that people who DCA long term are upBitcoinUndisc. Stephan Livera agreed, calling it how you winstephanlivera and posting a video on why DCA still works at $68kstephanlivera.

The rest was jokes and cycle talk. AutismCapital asked Did Bitcoin fuck a Chinese spy too?AutismCapital. BitPaine's chart of the past year came with what a year lmfaoBitPaine. Benjamin Cowen: Bear markets make fools of both bulls and bearsbenjamincowen. MikeWMunz called it capitulation everywhere and the time capitulation portion of a bear marketmikewmunz. British Hodl's version: nobody he knows who times it week to week has more Bitcoin than five years agoBritishHodl.

Bitcoin is now back below $70k.
A screenshot of a financial trading interface showing the BTCUSD spot price at 69,573.83 USD in red text to indicate a drop. The display includes a market status indicator confirming the market is open alongside volume metrics.
text in image
BTCUSD Bitcoin / U.S. Dollar • CRYPTO Spot • Crypto 69,573.83 USD -1,803.19 -2.53% ● Market open Volume Avg. vol.
♥ 2257 · ↻ 59
11 more posts in this story
Think about this, HOLDers. Bitcoin just traded at a lower price than it traded in November 2021. How many of you who owned Bitcoin back then expected it to be below the Nov. 2021 high more than five years later? Bitcoin is in a long-term bear market. The long-term trend is down.
♥ 1538 · ↻ 104
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapitalFri 2:32pm
Did Bitcoin fuck a Chinese spy too? Jesus Christ
A line chart displaying the price performance of Bitcoin against the US Dollar over a one-day period, showing a significant downward trend in red.
text in image
BTC-USD Bitcoin USD 69,383.63 -5.87% CCC · USD 1D 1W 1M 3M 6M YTD 1Y 2Y 5Y 10Y 71,468 70,866 70,264 69,661 9 2 7 12
♥ 1781 · ↻ 72
Bit Paine ⚡️@BitPaineFri 2:47pm
what a year lmfao
A line chart displays the Bitcoin price over a one-year period, showing a current value of $69,032.58 and a total decline of 31.99% from the previous year. The graph illustrates significant volatility with multiple sharp peaks and troughs before ending in a steep drop.
text in image
Bitcoin price $69,032.58 ↓ 31.99% $32,472.04 Past year 24H 1W 1M 3M 1Y 3Y ALL
♥ 296 · ↻ 2
Bitcoin has suffered a sharp sell-off, falling through several key support levels and tagging the 200-week moving average at around $67.8k. The correction has challenged the emerging bull market thesis, while investor panic is driving significant realised losses across the network. In our latest piece, @_Checkmatey_ examines Bitcoin's current valuation through the lens of market psychology, historical probabilities and mean reversion models, asking a critical question: Is Bitcoin cheap again? Read the article here -> newsletter.checkonchain.com/p/is-bitcoin-cheap-a
A financial chart titled "Bitcoin Mean Reversion Index" displays historical price data and various on-chain metrics from 2015 to 2025, highlighting a current dip into a shaded "Value Zone" similar to previous market cycles in 2015, 2019-20, and 2023.
text in image
Bitcoin Mean Reversion Index $100k $10k $1k $100 $10 $1 Index Range Powerlaw 200WMA Fast-Slow Index Spread Cointime Price 200DMA Ceiling index STH Cost Basis Bitcoin Price Floor Index True Market Mean Slow Index Realised Price Fast Index 90d-Onchain VWAP 365d-Onchain VWAP Index Mean Reversion Index Returns to Q23 Back Into The Value Zone checkonchain 2015 2019-20 2023 2024 2025 Mean Quantile: 23.3% 100 200 50 0 -50 -100
newsletter.checkonchain.com
https://newsletter.checkonchain.com/p/is-bitcoin-cheap-again
♥ 166 · ↻ 7
Bitcoin just fell to $68k. Have we been here before? Why long term DCA still works
text in image
SLP Bitcoin at $68k. Been here before? @stephanlivera
♥ 29 · ↻ 1
Bitcoin is at its 200-week moving average tonight of ~$68k. Historically, that’s been one of the best times to increase risk exposure to Bitcoin. It’s also when the way a Bitcoin company is built matters most. Investors in Strive know our amplification comes only from preferred equity, and that we keep large cash reserves. They also understand we have no encumbered Bitcoin and are uniquely positioned to withstand dips. What I think is less understood is the value of having two deeply liquid preferred equities already trading, and how that lets us turn dips into a higher amplification ratio when Bitcoin recovers. Said another way, these dips can make us even more valuable because of the engines and structure we have in place. Think about the three ways a Bitcoin company with amplification could go through a drawdown: 1. Bad debt terms. A drawdown can force you to sell Bitcoin at the worst possible time. You don’t just round-trip when Bitcoin recovers. You permanently impair shareholder value. 2. No engine. Bitcoin falls, your stock falls, Bitcoin recovers, and you end up roughly where you started. 3. Liquid preferred equity with real demand already in the market. You can issue more preferred while Bitcoin is cheap, and come out the other side with a higher amplification ratio than you went in with. That third path is what Strive has done over the last year. Last Dec 31, Bitcoin was ~$87.5K and our amplification ratio was 30%. By Sep 30, Bitcoin was back near that level at ~$83.6K. Our amplification was 55%. Similar Bitcoin price, but with almost double the amplification. Even as Bitcoin rose 43% off the June low, which on its own should have cut our amplification from 67% to ~47%, we held at 55%. After launching SATS and with tonight’s dip, our amplification ratio is now over 70%. Year to date, ASST is up ~51% while Bitcoin is down ~19%. I believe this performance is primarily due to the structure we’ve very intentionally built with no debt and no pledged Bitcoin. That means no margin calls or debt maturities, and it lets us think long term and act opportunistically when Bitcoin dips. I don’t think the market properly values this yet, and additionally rarely uses discounted forward-return modeling when assessing what a Bitcoin treasury company is worth. On a forward view of total returns under reasonable Bitcoin bull scenarios, I believe our common equity is undervalued, even though most mNAV calculations would show over 1x. There is a lot more to discuss on this, but it’s why we removed mNAV calculations from our dashboard over the past week. mNAV captures a single moment in time and treats our operating company as if it were just a passive fund. The discount we see in our equity is why we haven’t issued common equity over the past couple of weeks. We had some excess cash above our 18-month dividend reserve, and at these levels we’d view common issuance as dilutive, even with an mNAV over 1x, and ideally minimized unless we viewed it as necessary to invest in the long term success of our Digital Credit business. Bitcoin dips and down years are rough for many investors, especially if you’re not used to Bitcoin’s volatility. As long-time Bitcoiners, we’ve always understood it. We built Strive on purpose not just to withstand that volatility, but to add value for our common shareholders through it. We remain very constructive on Bitcoin risk going into 2027 and view these dips not only as an opportunity but as a blessing. We’ve used them to create additional value for our shareholders several times over the past year. It’s time to do it again. $ASST $SATA $SATS
A financial line chart titled 'ASST amplification held well above the price-only path through the Bitcoin recovery' plotting amplification ratios and Bitcoin prices over a timeline from January to November. The graph features an orange line for Bitcoin price, a blue line for actual ASST amplificatio
text in image
ASST amplification held well above the price-only path through the Bitcoin recovery 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Jan 26 Mar 26 May 26 Jul 26 Sep 26 Nov 26 Amplification ratio (%) 30% 47% 67% 55% 69% Bitcoin price ($K) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 ASST amplification (actual) No new preferred after Dec 31, 2025 (price effect only) Bitcoin price (right, $K) Sources: Strive 8-K filings (BTC held, SATA/SATS stated amount, reported quarter-end ratios); Bitcoin daily closes. Weekly ratios computed at daily close; Strive reports at 4 PM ET.
♥ 1141 · ↻ 125 · retweeted by @BitcoinPierre, @PunterJeff
Not a single person I’ve met trying to time Bitcoin week to week has more Bitcoin now than 5 years ago.
♥ 233 · ↻ 6 · retweeted by @BitPaine
Take a look around. Capitulation everywhere. Macro looks horrible. Exchange hacks. Self custody hacks. Fear for the future. AI rolling over. Price not moving. Completely devoid of positive news. Many unable to handle the time capitulation portion of a bear market and end of a bear cycle. It feels like it goes on forever with no end in sight. It’s a reminder the people who claim they would have held till today buying at $250 in 2015 or $4k in 2018 are few and far between. The list is endless for doomsday events that had to be endured to make it this far. Political and criminal attacks from every angle. Extreme conviction and mental fortitude. This market is not for the weak. Those that are come and go quicker than you can blink. My third full bear market and it’s all very similar. It gets easier over time as comfort is found in patterns that repeat in a surprisingly similar fashion over and over again. You feel like you’ve been here before. The sentiment is the same. The price action is the same. The faces may change but human behavior does not. It’s as predictable as the sun rising. Bitcoin’s future new highs will be met with plenty of joy. Perhaps more than last cycle given the length of this cycle and changes in the industry. The community may be more fractured today than ever before in regard to future direction. Prices going up always lifts the mood and that time is coming again soon. You’ll realize all the hand wringing was a waste of mental and emotional energy. The good times are ahead yet again.
♥ 221 · ↻ 17 · retweeted by @stephanlivera
Think about this, HOLDers. Bitcoin just traded at a lower price than it traded in November 2021. How many of you who owned Bitcoin back then expected it to be below the Nov. 2021 high more than five years later? Bitcoin is in a long-term bear market. The long-term trend is down.
replying to @PeterSchiff
@PeterSchiff In Nov 2022 it was lower than the 2017 ATH too. Anyone can cherry pick prior tops against bottoms. Still, people who DCA long term are up.
replying to @stephanlivera
Undisclosed ₿ ✝️⚡ ∞@BitcoinUndiscFri 3:46pm
@stephanlivera @PeterSchiff Well said, Stephan. People don't understand Bitcoin math. It sharply goes down and sharply goes up. The way to win with Bitcoin is to hodl for the long term and keep buying. I've been in Bitcoin for 11 years now, and I've done extremely well by hodling and DCAing.
♥ 14 · ↻ 1 · retweeted by @stephanlivera
replying to @stephanlivera
Undisclosed ₿ ✝️⚡ ∞@BitcoinUndiscFri 3:46pm
@stephanlivera @PeterSchiff Well said, Stephan. People don't understand Bitcoin math. It sharply goes down and sharply goes up. The way to win with Bitcoin is to hodl for the long term and keep buying. I've been in Bitcoin for 11 years now, and I've done extremely well by hodling and DCAing.
quoting @BitcoinUndisc
This is how you win. Long term DCA and HODL.
♥ 28 · ↻ 1

Spy case against Huang falters as DOJ, CIA and DNI decline to conclude

The resignation is old news; the reversal is the story. CNN reported that intelligence collected so far does not proveDavidSacks Alice Huang was a spy for Beijing. David Sacks tallied the denials: the AG says "no conclusions reached", the CIA "not yet convinced", the DNI "not entirely accurate and over-torqued". He called it Bombshell story and said the only crime that we know for sure happened is the leaking of the classified memoDavidSacks. AutismCapital, watching CNN: is CNN defending Jensen?AutismCapital

Zerohedge carried Blanche's own line that DOJ has not confirmedzerohedge whether she was a spy.

The feed's response was to aim at the board. Balaji said the allegations may be as fake as Russiagate and that employees, shareholders and customers should demand the anti-Jensen directors step down, with mass employee resignationsbalajis possible if not. Beff Jezos told e/accs to press the Nvidia board to reinstate Jensenbeffjezos. Pietro Ventani reached for the Dreyfus AffairPietroVentani. Udi Wertheimer thought politicians were pot committedudiWertheimer, so next week's hearing would be hard to watch whatever the facts.

News: The US intel community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple sources telling CNN that the intelligence collected on her to date does not prove that she was acting as a spy for Beijing. cnn.com/2026/11/12/politics/alice-huang-us-intel
www.cnn.com
US intel isn’t sure if businesswoman spied on Nvidia for China, doesn’t mean she wasn’t a risk,...
The US intelligence community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple...
quoting @NatashaBertrand
Bombshell story. The spy narrative is collapsing already. Is there clear & convincing evidence that Alice Huang was a Chinese spy? - AG says no. (“no conclusions reached”). - CIA says no. (“not yet convinced”). - DNI says no (“not entirely accurate and over-torqued”). - Ranking Democrat on House Intelligence (incoming Chairman) says no. (“today, at least, I don’t know”). This was immediately after he was briefed. Who argues otherwise? Anonymous officials tell CNN “it strains credulity to believe that she was not acting as an agent of the Chinese government — simply by virtue of the fact that she is a successful Chinese businesswoman working with one of America’s most powerful companies.” This is their proof after a year of investigating and surveillance? That she was a “successful Chinese businesswoman”? At this point, the only crime that we know for sure happened is the leaking of the classified memo. Who did that and why? An investigation should be opened.
♥ 24.1k · ↻ 3522
6 more posts in this story
The US intelligence community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple sources telling CNN that the intelligence collected on her to date does not prove that she was acting as a spy for Beijing. cnn.com/2026/11/12/politics/alice-huang-us-intel
www.cnn.com
US intel isn’t sure if businesswoman spied on Nvidia for China, doesn’t mean she wasn’t a risk,...
The US intelligence community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple...
quoting @CNN
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapitalFri 3:36pm
Wait -- is CNN defending Jensen? Are we seeing this correctly?
♥ 357 · ↻ 11
News: The US intel community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple sources telling CNN that the intelligence collected on her to date does not prove that she was acting as a spy for Beijing. cnn.com/2026/11/12/politics/alice-huang-us-intel
www.cnn.com
US intel isn’t sure if businesswoman spied on Nvidia for China, doesn’t mean she wasn’t a risk,...
The US intelligence community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple...
quoting @NatashaBertrand
Bombshell story. The spy narrative is collapsing already. Is there clear & convincing evidence that Alice Huang was a Chinese spy? - AG says no. (“no conclusions reached”). - CIA says no. (“not yet convinced”). - DNI says no (“not entirely accurate and over-torqued”). - Ranking Democrat on House Intelligence (incoming Chairman) says no. (“today, at least, I don’t know”). This was immediately after he was briefed. Who argues otherwise? Anonymous officials tell CNN “it strains credulity to believe that she was not acting as an agent of the Chinese government — simply by virtue of the fact that she is a successful Chinese businesswoman working with one of America’s most powerful companies.” This is their proof after a year of investigating and surveillance? That she was a “successful Chinese businesswoman”? At this point, the only crime that we know for sure happened is the leaking of the classified memo. Who did that and why? An investigation should be opened.
quoting @DavidSacks
Nvidia is nothing without its people. It now appears the national security allegations may be as fake as Russiagate. If so, Nvidia employees, shareholders, partners, and customers have immense leverage. Whether publicly or privately, collectively or individually, they can approach the members of the board that precipitously pushed for Jensen’s resignation and instead demand that anti-Jensen board members resign. Else mass employee resignations may follow, as may shareholder, partner, and customer suits against anti-Jensen board members for breaching their fiduciary duty. Because the value of Nvidia as an economic entity — for its employees, shareholders, partners, and customers — is obviously far higher if the founder and CEO of what was the most valuable company in world history is reinstated and this coup is defeated. Trillions in capital, the fate of open weight AI, and the global economy itself all hang in the balance. So: if you are e/acc, if you are a techno-optimist, if you support open weight models, or if you just want to rectify a gross injustice — it is legitimate for you to politely press the Nvidia board with every tool at your disposal to reinstate Jensen Huang. Remember how much capital is at stake. For many parties, it’d be worth it to spend millions — or even billions — on any legally permissible tactic that can get anti-Jensen board members to reverse their votes and then step down. Remember also: the kind of spineless NPC board member that would vote against Jensen Huang due to a bad news cycle would likely buckle if subject to even 1/1000 of the scrutiny that poor Jensen has been subject to. Mechanically: step one is to do citizen journalism to determine how each board member voted. Step two is to get the anti-Jensen board members to resign. And step three is the return of the king. OpenAI shows it can be done. There are after all just a few human beings who need to change their anti-Jensen votes, or step down, or both. Their names and duties are public. And they’re meant to be accountable to the shareholders. This analysis by @gemchange_ltd is as good a place as any to start.
A data table listing NVIDIA board members with their photos, tenures, stock stakes, and a 'Loyalty assessment' column that color-codes directors as either loyal or having unconfirmed loyalty. The chart highlights Jensen Huang as a co-founder while marking newer members like Dawn Hudson and Stephen C
text in image
NVIDIA Board of Directors Photo Director On board since Voting weight NVDA stake Disclosed shares Loyalty assessment Background 3 Jensen Huang 1993 9,09% 3,58% 870 604 104 Co-founder Co-founder, president and CEO of NVIDIA. The only director NVIDIA classifies as non-independent. 4 Harvey C. Jones 1993 9,09% 0,0288% 7 003 687 Early associate Former Synopsys CEO. The founders invited him onto the board in 1993. He worked with Huang during NVIDIA's early turnaround. 5 Tench Coxe 1993 9,09% 0,1257% 30 555 240 Early associate Former managing director of Sutter Hill Ventures, one of NVIDIA's earliest investors. On the board since its founding. 6 Mark A. Stevens 1993–2006 since 2008 9,09% 0,1401% 34 069 572 Early associate Early investor from Sequoia Capital. Rejoined the board in 2008. Held the largest disclosed stake among independent directors in the March snapshot. 7 A. Brooke Seawell 1997 9,09% 0,0103% 2 506 607 Longtime colleague Audit Committee chair and former Synopsys CFO. Joined the board before NVIDIA's IPO. Author: @gemchange_ltd 8 Dawn Hudson 2013 9,09% 0,0015% 368 887 Loyalty unconfirmed Compensation Committee chair. Former Pepsi-Cola North America CEO and former NFL chief marketing officer. 9 Stephen C. Neal 2019 9,09% 0,00076039% 184 867 Loyalty unconfirmed Lead independent director. Chairs the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and convenes private sessions of independent directors. 10 John O. Dabiri 2020 9,09% 0,00006083% 14 788 Loyalty unconfirmed Caltech professor. Serves on the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees. 11 Aarti Shah 2020 9,09% 0,00010538% 25 620 Loyalty unconfirmed Former chief information and digital officer at Eli Lilly. Serves on the Audit and Compensation committees. 12 Melissa B. Lora 2023 9,09% 0,00000740% 1 799 Loyalty unconfirmed Former president of Taco Bell International. Serves on the Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees. 13 Suzanne Nora Johnson 2026 9,09% 0,00001027% 2 496 Loyalty unconfirmed Former vice chairman of Goldman Sachs. Joined the board and Audit Committee on July 13, 2026.
Again, if it’s true that there is no national security issue, Jensen Huang must be reinstated at once and the anti-Jensen board members must step down. Employees, shareholders, customers, and partners will demand it. @JensenHuang @nvidia
♥ 4993 · ↻ 644
News: The US intel community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple sources telling CNN that the intelligence collected on her to date does not prove that she was acting as a spy for Beijing. cnn.com/2026/11/12/politics/alice-huang-us-intel
www.cnn.com
US intel isn’t sure if businesswoman spied on Nvidia for China, doesn’t mean she wasn’t a risk,...
The US intelligence community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple...
quoting @NatashaBertrand
Bombshell story. The spy narrative is collapsing already. Is there clear & convincing evidence that Alice Huang was a Chinese spy? - AG says no. (“no conclusions reached”). - CIA says no. (“not yet convinced”). - DNI says no (“not entirely accurate and over-torqued”). - Ranking Democrat on House Intelligence (incoming Chairman) says no. (“today, at least, I don’t know”). This was immediately after he was briefed. Who argues otherwise? Anonymous officials tell CNN “it strains credulity to believe that she was not acting as an agent of the Chinese government — simply by virtue of the fact that she is a successful Chinese businesswoman working with one of America’s most powerful companies.” This is their proof after a year of investigating and surveillance? That she was a “successful Chinese businesswoman”? At this point, the only crime that we know for sure happened is the leaking of the classified memo. Who did that and why? An investigation should be opened.
quoting @DavidSacks
Nvidia is nothing without its people. It now appears the national security allegations may be as fake as Russiagate. If so, Nvidia employees, shareholders, partners, and customers have immense leverage. Whether publicly or privately, collectively or individually, they can approach the members of the board that precipitously pushed for Jensen’s resignation and instead demand that anti-Jensen board members resign. Else mass employee resignations may follow, as may shareholder, partner, and customer suits against anti-Jensen board members for breaching their fiduciary duty. Because the value of Nvidia as an economic entity — for its employees, shareholders, partners, and customers — is obviously far higher if the founder and CEO of what was the most valuable company in world history is reinstated and this coup is defeated. Trillions in capital, the fate of open weight AI, and the global economy itself all hang in the balance. So: if you are e/acc, if you are a techno-optimist, if you support open weight models, or if you just want to rectify a gross injustice — it is legitimate for you to politely press the Nvidia board with every tool at your disposal to reinstate Jensen Huang. Remember how much capital is at stake. For many parties, it’d be worth it to spend millions — or even billions — on any legally permissible tactic that can get anti-Jensen board members to reverse their votes and then step down. Remember also: the kind of spineless NPC board member that would vote against Jensen Huang due to a bad news cycle would likely buckle if subject to even 1/1000 of the scrutiny that poor Jensen has been subject to. Mechanically: step one is to do citizen journalism to determine how each board member voted. Step two is to get the anti-Jensen board members to resign. And step three is the return of the king. OpenAI shows it can be done. There are after all just a few human beings who need to change their anti-Jensen votes, or step down, or both. Their names and duties are public. And they’re meant to be accountable to the shareholders. This analysis by @gemchange_ltd is as good a place as any to start.
A data table listing NVIDIA board members with their photos, tenures, stock stakes, and a 'Loyalty assessment' column that color-codes directors as either loyal or having unconfirmed loyalty. The chart highlights Jensen Huang as a co-founder while marking newer members like Dawn Hudson and Stephen C
text in image
NVIDIA Board of Directors Photo Director On board since Voting weight NVDA stake Disclosed shares Loyalty assessment Background 3 Jensen Huang 1993 9,09% 3,58% 870 604 104 Co-founder Co-founder, president and CEO of NVIDIA. The only director NVIDIA classifies as non-independent. 4 Harvey C. Jones 1993 9,09% 0,0288% 7 003 687 Early associate Former Synopsys CEO. The founders invited him onto the board in 1993. He worked with Huang during NVIDIA's early turnaround. 5 Tench Coxe 1993 9,09% 0,1257% 30 555 240 Early associate Former managing director of Sutter Hill Ventures, one of NVIDIA's earliest investors. On the board since its founding. 6 Mark A. Stevens 1993–2006 since 2008 9,09% 0,1401% 34 069 572 Early associate Early investor from Sequoia Capital. Rejoined the board in 2008. Held the largest disclosed stake among independent directors in the March snapshot. 7 A. Brooke Seawell 1997 9,09% 0,0103% 2 506 607 Longtime colleague Audit Committee chair and former Synopsys CFO. Joined the board before NVIDIA's IPO. Author: @gemchange_ltd 8 Dawn Hudson 2013 9,09% 0,0015% 368 887 Loyalty unconfirmed Compensation Committee chair. Former Pepsi-Cola North America CEO and former NFL chief marketing officer. 9 Stephen C. Neal 2019 9,09% 0,00076039% 184 867 Loyalty unconfirmed Lead independent director. Chairs the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and convenes private sessions of independent directors. 10 John O. Dabiri 2020 9,09% 0,00006083% 14 788 Loyalty unconfirmed Caltech professor. Serves on the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees. 11 Aarti Shah 2020 9,09% 0,00010538% 25 620 Loyalty unconfirmed Former chief information and digital officer at Eli Lilly. Serves on the Audit and Compensation committees. 12 Melissa B. Lora 2023 9,09% 0,00000740% 1 799 Loyalty unconfirmed Former president of Taco Bell International. Serves on the Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees. 13 Suzanne Nora Johnson 2026 9,09% 0,00001027% 2 496 Loyalty unconfirmed Former vice chairman of Goldman Sachs. Joined the board and Audit Committee on July 13, 2026.
+1 more in @balajis's thread
Again, if it’s true that there is no national security issue, Jensen Huang must be reinstated at once and the anti-Jensen board members must step down. Employees, shareholders, customers, and partners will demand it. @JensenHuang @nvidia
Fri 10:47pm
quoting @balajis
All e/acc 's should press the Nvidia board to reinstate Jensen The whole US economy hinges on this
♥ 458 · ↻ 40 · retweeted by @balajis
News: The US intel community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple sources telling CNN that the intelligence collected on her to date does not prove that she was acting as a spy for Beijing. cnn.com/2026/11/12/politics/alice-huang-us-intel
www.cnn.com
US intel isn’t sure if businesswoman spied on Nvidia for China, doesn’t mean she wasn’t a risk,...
The US intelligence community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple...
quoting @NatashaBertrand
Bombshell story. The spy narrative is collapsing already. Is there clear & convincing evidence that Alice Huang was a Chinese spy? - AG says no. (“no conclusions reached”). - CIA says no. (“not yet convinced”). - DNI says no (“not entirely accurate and over-torqued”). - Ranking Democrat on House Intelligence (incoming Chairman) says no. (“today, at least, I don’t know”). This was immediately after he was briefed. Who argues otherwise? Anonymous officials tell CNN “it strains credulity to believe that she was not acting as an agent of the Chinese government — simply by virtue of the fact that she is a successful Chinese businesswoman working with one of America’s most powerful companies.” This is their proof after a year of investigating and surveillance? That she was a “successful Chinese businesswoman”? At this point, the only crime that we know for sure happened is the leaking of the classified memo. Who did that and why? An investigation should be opened.
quoting @DavidSacks
Let me catch you up with what’s happening. Anonymous leakers spread tabloid narratives about one of America’s most successful men. Spies, blackmail, state secrets! The grain of truth is that the billionaire is not exactly chaste. But the ‘national security’ angle is entirely fabricated by a few anonymous sources misrepresenting the entirety of the Intelligence Community (IC), in order to force through domestic political outcomes. I’m not talking about November 2026. I’m talking about November 2016 — Russiagate, an unhinged theory that President Trump was secretly working with Putin. These claims took exactly the form of a James Bond movie, alleging that Trump was sleeping with Russian prostitutes, or “honeypots”, that he had been blackmailed by Putin, that he was an agent of the Kremlin. Regardless of Trump’s policy merits, it is an objective fact that these claims were false. How Russigate took off was simple. Anonymous Intelligence Community leakers laundered false claims from political consultants Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele. That way, even though journalists were repeating lies, they could say they were simply repeating what the Intelligence Community told them. That didn’t mean the entire IC agreed, just that they had one politically weaponized source they could use to advance their narrative. I’ve asked several intelocutors who believe that Alice Huang is a spy or asset what level of evidence they would expect from a credible claim. The smart ones have asked me the same question. While Russiagate turned out to be false, at the time, its proponents made specific falsifiable claims in order to build up credibility. The Trump Organization maintained a secret communications channel with Russia's Alfa Bank. Carter Page secretly coordinated with senior Kremlin officials on behalf of Trump. Sergei Millian was the source of the dossier's central Trump–Russia conspiracy allegations. Michael Cohen traveled to Prague to coordinate with Russian operatives. These were all claims to be investigated. All of these were proven to be objectively false. See part 1 and 4 of the excellent Columbia Journalism Review series on Russiagate. With the Jensen story, we do not even have these crumbs. The entire premise that Alice Huang is a Chinese spy is an article of faith, spread baselessly without providing specific allegations of how she spied on Jensen or others, let alone proof of those allegations. Let me be clear about the distinction. Not only does the Alice Huang spy claim have absolutely zero evidence, like the Russiagate claims. Unlike the Russiagate claims, it does not even name specific allegations for which they could have evidence. The fact that the level of accusation does not even rise to the laughably low threshold of Russiagate shows that this is an odious fabrication, a lie that does not even bother to go through the motions of justifying that it could be true, let alone proving it is true. The lesson these political operatives learned was to avoid trying to build up big lies by small, evidence-based claims. Just go for the sweeping lie and when anyone asks for evidence, call them a traitor. Now, the broader IC has already overturned the most extreme claims made about Alice Huang, admitting there is "little evidence" and that claims were "premature". But that is not enough. We need to call this what it is: a politically weaponized fabrication without even the most basic pretense of truth. Russiagate failed. Donald Trump won in 2016. Despite being less credible than the Steele dossier, the Jensen allegations have succeeded, at least temporarily, in removing the CEO of the world’s most valuable company. It is a horrific moment for America.
quoting @DavidSacks
Nvidia is nothing without its people. It now appears the national security allegations may be as fake as Russiagate. If so, Nvidia employees, shareholders, partners, and customers have immense leverage. Whether publicly or privately, collectively or individually, they can approach the members of the board that precipitously pushed for Jensen’s resignation and instead demand that anti-Jensen board members resign. Else mass employee resignations may follow, as may shareholder, partner, and customer suits against anti-Jensen board members for breaching their fiduciary duty. Because the value of Nvidia as an economic entity — for its employees, shareholders, partners, and customers — is obviously far higher if the founder and CEO of what was the most valuable company in world history is reinstated and this coup is defeated. Trillions in capital, the fate of open weight AI, and the global economy itself all hang in the balance. So: if you are e/acc, if you are a techno-optimist, if you support open weight models, or if you just want to rectify a gross injustice — it is legitimate for you to politely press the Nvidia board with every tool at your disposal to reinstate Jensen Huang. Remember how much capital is at stake. For many parties, it’d be worth it to spend millions — or even billions — on any legally permissible tactic that can get anti-Jensen board members to reverse their votes and then step down. Remember also: the kind of spineless NPC board member that would vote against Jensen Huang due to a bad news cycle would likely buckle if subject to even 1/1000 of the scrutiny that poor Jensen has been subject to. Mechanically: step one is to do citizen journalism to determine how each board member voted. Step two is to get the anti-Jensen board members to resign. And step three is the return of the king. OpenAI shows it can be done. There are after all just a few human beings who need to change their anti-Jensen votes, or step down, or both. Their names and duties are public. And they’re meant to be accountable to the shareholders. This analysis by @gemchange_ltd is as good a place as any to start.
A data table listing NVIDIA board members with their photos, tenures, stock stakes, and a 'Loyalty assessment' column that color-codes directors as either loyal or having unconfirmed loyalty. The chart highlights Jensen Huang as a co-founder while marking newer members like Dawn Hudson and Stephen C
text in image
NVIDIA Board of Directors Photo Director On board since Voting weight NVDA stake Disclosed shares Loyalty assessment Background 3 Jensen Huang 1993 9,09% 3,58% 870 604 104 Co-founder Co-founder, president and CEO of NVIDIA. The only director NVIDIA classifies as non-independent. 4 Harvey C. Jones 1993 9,09% 0,0288% 7 003 687 Early associate Former Synopsys CEO. The founders invited him onto the board in 1993. He worked with Huang during NVIDIA's early turnaround. 5 Tench Coxe 1993 9,09% 0,1257% 30 555 240 Early associate Former managing director of Sutter Hill Ventures, one of NVIDIA's earliest investors. On the board since its founding. 6 Mark A. Stevens 1993–2006 since 2008 9,09% 0,1401% 34 069 572 Early associate Early investor from Sequoia Capital. Rejoined the board in 2008. Held the largest disclosed stake among independent directors in the March snapshot. 7 A. Brooke Seawell 1997 9,09% 0,0103% 2 506 607 Longtime colleague Audit Committee chair and former Synopsys CFO. Joined the board before NVIDIA's IPO. Author: @gemchange_ltd 8 Dawn Hudson 2013 9,09% 0,0015% 368 887 Loyalty unconfirmed Compensation Committee chair. Former Pepsi-Cola North America CEO and former NFL chief marketing officer. 9 Stephen C. Neal 2019 9,09% 0,00076039% 184 867 Loyalty unconfirmed Lead independent director. Chairs the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and convenes private sessions of independent directors. 10 John O. Dabiri 2020 9,09% 0,00006083% 14 788 Loyalty unconfirmed Caltech professor. Serves on the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees. 11 Aarti Shah 2020 9,09% 0,00010538% 25 620 Loyalty unconfirmed Former chief information and digital officer at Eli Lilly. Serves on the Audit and Compensation committees. 12 Melissa B. Lora 2023 9,09% 0,00000740% 1 799 Loyalty unconfirmed Former president of Taco Bell International. Serves on the Audit and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees. 13 Suzanne Nora Johnson 2026 9,09% 0,00001027% 2 496 Loyalty unconfirmed Former vice chairman of Goldman Sachs. Joined the board and Audit Committee on July 13, 2026.
replying to @balajis · quoting @brianchau57
Again, if it’s true that there is no national security issue, Jensen Huang must be reinstated at once and the anti-Jensen board members must step down. Employees, shareholders, customers, and partners will demand it. @JensenHuang @nvidia
replying to @balajis
@balajis @JensenHuang @nvidia i think you’re right… doesn’t it mean that some politicians will view the spy story is a survival issue for them? i think it’s inevitable that the hearing next week will be very hard to watch regardless of the facts. they’re pot committed
♥ 6 · ↻ 0
News: The US intel community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple sources telling CNN that the intelligence collected on her to date does not prove that she was acting as a spy for Beijing. cnn.com/2026/11/12/politics/alice-huang-us-intel
www.cnn.com
US intel isn’t sure if businesswoman spied on Nvidia for China, doesn’t mean she wasn’t a risk,...
The US intelligence community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple...
quoting @NatashaBertrand
Bombshell story. The spy narrative is collapsing already. Is there clear & convincing evidence that Alice Huang was a Chinese spy? - AG says no. (“no conclusions reached”). - CIA says no. (“not yet convinced”). - DNI says no (“not entirely accurate and over-torqued”). - Ranking Democrat on House Intelligence (incoming Chairman) says no. (“today, at least, I don’t know”). This was immediately after he was briefed. Who argues otherwise? Anonymous officials tell CNN “it strains credulity to believe that she was not acting as an agent of the Chinese government — simply by virtue of the fact that she is a successful Chinese businesswoman working with one of America’s most powerful companies.” This is their proof after a year of investigating and surveillance? That she was a “successful Chinese businesswoman”? At this point, the only crime that we know for sure happened is the leaking of the classified memo. Who did that and why? An investigation should be opened.

Microsoft's email outage runs into a second day and takes Claude's connector down

Bloomberg had Microsoft struggling to restore accessbusiness more than nine hours in, with email and chat out. By the time BBC wrote it up, Microsoft was saying it wasn't a cyber incident and the fixes had been largely unsuccessfulBBCBreaking. Its own status feed told the story: changes not taking as expectedrationalaussie. Rational Aussie translated: Aka it's fucked.

AutismCapital offered two theories: The Cyberhacks are worse than we're even being told, or they're all just incompetentAutismCapital. He also decided that taking out Teams and Copilot was definitely white hatAutismCapital.

Zerohedge's angle was dependency: one MSFT cloud outage and the entire AI ecosystem grinds to a haltzerohedge, with a Claude status page blaming the Microsoft 365 connector. Goldman's Sean Johnstone said the desk was operating off backup emailzerohedge. Zerohedge also posted the Excel server is too busy error under Lotus 1-2-3 it is thenzerohedge.

By evening, Microsoft was seeing broad recovery and stabilityzerohedge. Zerohedge: cause everyone is using telnet.

Microsoft is struggling to restore access to some of its flagship software more than nine hours after an outage began, leaving users unable to use email and chat services in one of the tech giant’s most severe disruptions in recent memory bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-11-12/microsoft
www.bloomberg.com
Microsoft Says It’s Working to Fix Outlook, Copilot Outage
Microsoft Corp. is struggling to restore access to some of its flagship software more than nine hours after an outage began, leaving users unable to use email and chat services in one of the tech...
♥ 780 · ↻ 311 · retweeted by @WClemente
9 more posts in this story
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapitalFri 4:47pm
And they can't get Outlook back online. The Cyberhacks are worse than we're even being told.
A screenshot of a text snippet stating that Microsoft employs approximately 223,000 full-time workers worldwide, sourced from Macrotrends.
text in image
Microsoft employs approximately 223,000 full-time workers worldwide. Macrotrends +1
Or they're all just incompetent. There's that possibility too.
♥ 804 · ↻ 25
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapitalFri 5:24pm
Taking out Microsoft Teams and Copilot may have been one of the most benevolent thing the hackers could ever do. Definitely white hat.
♥ 1078 · ↻ 49
replying to @MSFT365Status
Microsoft 365 Status@MSFT365StatusFri 2:13pm
13 earlier in @MSFT365Status's thread
We're investigating reports of users experiencing issues accessing Exchange Online mailboxes through multiple connection methods in the Americas. More details can be found in the Microsoft 365 admin center under EX1550543.
Fri 4:54am
While we're working to mitigate impact, we've confirmed the issue may affect Microsoft 365 service connectivity for users in any region, more information will be provided in the Microsoft 365 admin center under EX1550543.
Fri 5:07am
We've determined a portion of infrastructure is experiencing elevated load across multiple regions, which is likely contributing to the connectivity errors. We're providing more information under EX1550543 and MO1550821 in the Microsoft 365 admin center, as well as status.cloud.microsoft/
Fri 5:35am
We've begun redistributing connection traffic across our broader worldwide infrastructure to help balance the load. More info under EX1550543 and MO1550821 in the Microsoft 365 admin center, as well as status.cloud.microsoft if the admin center is not available to you.
Fri 5:48am
We're aggressively pursuing all pathways to reduce impact. We've paused all deployments, we're moving additional traffic off the affected infrastructure, and we're restarting affected servers to return them to service. More info under EX1550543 and MO1550821 in the Microsoft 365 admin center, as well as status.cloud.microsoft if the admin center is not available to you.
Fri 6:12am
We determined the elevated load isn't driven by an increase in traffic, but by a number of servers being unexpectedly unavailable; straining the remaining infrastructure. We're working to safely return them to service. More info under EX1550543 and MO1550821 in the Microsoft 365 admin center, as well as status.cloud.microsoft if the admin center is not available to you.
Fri 6:31am
We're testing a configuration change to address a problem that's causing servers to fail automated health checks and become unavailable. In parallel, we've initiated a restart of all affected servers and are monitoring health as they return to service. More info under EX1550543 and MO1550821 in the Microsoft 365 admin center, as well as status.cloud.microsoft if the admin center is not available to you.
Fri 6:50am
We've not identified any recent change correlated with the start of impact; however, our investigation indicates the failed health checks may originate from a specific component that's responsible for processing server health. We've taken steps to prevent additional servers from being impacted while we work to return the affected servers to service. More info under EX1550543 and MO1550821 in the Microsoft 365 admin center, as well as status.cloud.microsoft if the admin center is not available to you.
Fri 7:19am
We've validated an alternative service health check method, which allowed a subset of affected servers to successfully return to service. We're now applying this change more broadly. We're also preparing automated recovery systems to continually detect and restart unresponsive servers, to maintain service stability while this change progresses. More info under EX1550543 and MO1550821 in the Microsoft 365 admin center, as well as status.cloud.microsoft if the admin center is not available to you.
Fri 8:00am
We're actively restarting and validating the affected servers to return them to service. In parallel, we're assessing whether reverting a small number of recent configuration updates we identified could help accelerate recovery. More info under EX1550543 and MO1550821 in the Microsoft 365 admin center, as well as status.cloud.microsoft if the admin center is not available to you.
Fri 8:40am
We’re opening all available pathways to restore service, as our actions taken thus far have not provided the anticipated relief. We found a core process on affected servers is becoming overwhelmed, causing capacity loss. To validate a potential recovery, we're isolating a portion of infrastructure, restarting affected components, and reintroducing traffic to confirm the services remain stable before applying the change more broadly. More info under EX1550543 and MO1550821 in the Microsoft 365 admin center, as well as status.cloud.microsoft if the admin center is not available to you.
Fri 9:09am
We're returning a portion of affected servers to the service, and they remain stable so far. We're also shifting traffic to alternate routes wherever possible and observing limited recovery. In parallel, we've streamlined the process of returning the remaining affected servers to service. As capacity is restored, users may experience a gradual recovery as their clients reconnect. More info under EX1550543 and MO1550821 in the Microsoft 365 admin center, as well as status.cloud.microsoft if the admin center is not available to you.
Fri 10:04am
The servers we returned to service can become unresponsive again once they receive traffic; we're analyzing diagnostic data to determine what's triggering the behavior. In parallel, we're temporarily limiting which types of traffic can reach the affected infrastructure in some locations. Additionally, we're rebuilding a subset of affected servers using a previous configuration to validate if this prevents them from becoming unresponsive. More info under EX1550543 and MO1550821 in the Microsoft 365 admin center, as well as status.cloud.microsoft if the admin center is not available to you.
Fri 11:06am
We’ve monitored the status of the changes applied to improve serviceability and confirmed they're not taking as expected. We’re identifying alternate workstreams that can be applied to increase capacity in the face of sustained traffic management imbalances. More info under EX1550543 and MO1550821 in the Microsoft 365 admin center, as well as msft.it/6013xBHsf if the admin center is not available to you.
msft.it
https://msft.it/6013xBHsf
The weakest link: one MSFT cloud outage and the entire AI ecosystem grinds to a halt
The image is a screenshot of the Claude Status page showing multiple updates regarding elevated errors on claude.ai and the Microsoft 365 connector. The entries detail a service incident caused by a Microsoft 365 outage that disrupted mail, calendar, and search tools for Claude users.
text in image
Claude Status SUBSCRIBE TO UPDATES Elevated errors on claude.ai, the Claude API, and Claude Code Subscribe Investigating - We are investigating reports of degraded performance affecting claude.ai, the Claude API, and Claude Code. We will provide an update as soon as possible. Nov 13, 2026 - 13:09 UTC Elevated errors affecting the Microsoft 365 connector Subscribe Update - This issue is caused by a Microsoft 365 service incident, and mail, calendar and search tools in the Microsoft 365 connector are still failing for most requests. Claude for Outlook remains affected. You can follow Microsoft's progress at https://status.cloud.microsoft. We will update this post when service is restored. Nov 12, 2026 - 22:23 UTC Update - We are continuing to work with our upstream provider, who is restarting affected servers. Mail, calendar and search tools in the Microsoft 365 connector are still failing for most requests, and Claude for Outlook remains affected. We will provide another update as soon as we have more information. Nov 12, 2026 - 21:18 UTC Update - We are continuing to work with our upstream provider on this issue. Mail, calendar and search tools in the Microsoft 365 connector are still failing for most requests. Claude for Outlook is also affected: mail and calendar actions may fail, and some users may not be able to open the add-in. We will provide another update within the hour. Nov 12, 2026 - 20:28 UTC Identified - We have identified an issue with an upstream provider affecting the Microsoft 365 connector. Mail, calendar and search tools are failing for most requests, and new connections to the connector may not complete. We are in contact with them and will provide an update as soon as possible. Nov 12, 2026 - 18:34 UTC Investigating - We are investigating elevated errors and slow responses affecting the Microsoft 365 connector. Requests to mail, SharePoint, Teams chat and calendar through the connector may fail, and new connections to the connector may not complete. We will provide an update as soon as possible. Nov 12, 2026 - 17:52 UTC
♥ 1122 · ↻ 197
Goldman is running on email backup, "MSFT here is still down"... "Paraskevidekatriaphobia meets its modern upgrade - This morning the same energy hit Microsoft 365 outage - Outlook, Teams and Copilot are still reeling from an overwhelmed core process and a mysterious traffic surge (no cyberattack, just pure Friday the 13th vibes).... MSFT here is still down and most operating off backup email so reading email has never felt more mythological… or more dependent on tech that clearly didn’t get the memo about not being the unlucky guest." - Goldman TMT specialist Sean Johnstone
♥ 340 · ↻ 41
replying to @zerohedge
1 earlier in @zerohedge's thread
Hi @microsoft, please tell us more how great it is to save all excel models on One Drive
Fri 9:14am
A screenshot of a Microsoft Excel error dialog box displaying an error message about a busy server. The window includes an information icon and a green OK button in the bottom right corner.
text in image
Microsoft Excel We can't open this file because the server is too busy. Please try again later. OK
*MICROSOFT: SEEING BROAD RECOVERY AND STABILITY ACROSS SERVICES cause everyone is using telnet
♥ 264 · ↻ 18

Zerohedge maps the 'Bank of Nvidia' as the board looks for a CEO

Zerohedge's whole day on Nvidia was one idea: Jensen was the banker. Its map of the AI deals now resting on Colette Kresszerohedge had a two-chart pitch: Pick your poison: NVDA's circular financings or its off-balance sheet commitmentszerohedge. The second chart showed those commitments up tenfold in five quarters.

The mechanism, quoted: Nvidia buys a stake, the recipient commits to Nvidia hardware, and the cash comes back as GPU orderszerohedge. On the neoclouds' bad day: even a temporary pause could pull $50BN or more out of the AI ecosystem, QT for the AI trade, announced by press release at 8:48amzerohedge. The Market Ear counted a $3.5 trillion shadow of debt, leases and commitments and asked what happens if Jensen is no longer calling the shotsthemarketear.

Zerohedge posted CNBC, Bloomberg and WSJ headlines under Well that didn't take long, including the WSJ's account of Huang calling Kress a deer in the headlightszerohedge after she questioned some of his dealmaking.

The board has reportedly sounded out Arm's Rene Haas, per the FTzerohedge. Polymarket put his odds at 33% chancePolymarketMoney.

8 more posts in this story
quoting @zerohedge
Pick your poison: NVDA's circular financings or its off-balance sheet commitments.
A complex network diagram titled 'The Bank Of Nvidia' illustrates financial relationships between Nvidia and various AI entities like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta using colored boxes and directional lines. The chart visualizes equity investments, guarantees, and lease agreements to depict how Nvidia
text in image
The Bank Of Nvidia: Who The Chipmaker Funds, Backstops And Rents From (12 Nov 2026) Nvidia has emerged as the primary source of funding across the AI ecosystem: equity into labs, neoclouds, customers and suppliers, plus capacity buy-backs and lease guarantees that make their debt financeable. Most of the money comes back as GPU orders. Line width scales with $ size. [Legend: Equity investment / licence / M&A, Guarantee / credit backstop, Capacity buy-back / lease, Customer contract, Buys Nvidia GPUs & systems, Proposed, not signed] [Central Node] Nvidia: $99BN equity book · $108.5BN guarantees · $56BN cloud buy-backs & 3rd-party leases · $279BN supply commitments (26 Jul 2026) [Surrounding Nodes include OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI / SpaceX, Safe Superintelligence, Poolside, SB Energy, Other AI clouds, Chip optics & networking suppliers, Chip IP & model deals, Meta, IREN, Nebius, Nscale, CoreWeave, $500BN financing platform]
A stacked bar chart titled 'The Bank Of Nvidia's Iceberg' illustrates the exponential growth of off-balance sheet commitments from $50.9BN to $530.5BN over five fiscal quarters. An annotation highlights a tenfold increase in these financial obligations, which include supply commitments, cloud servic
text in image
The Bank Of Nvidia's Iceberg: Off-Balance Sheet Commitments Up 10x In Five Quarters Nvidia future purchase, cloud, lease and investment commitments plus maximum guarantee exposure, by fiscal quarter-end, $BN. Excludes the up to $125BN backstop on the $500BN Wall Street platform (MOUs only) and the $99BN equity book. 3QFY27 results due Nov 17. $600BN Supply, capacity & other purchase commitments $500BN Cloud services & AI-cloud buy-backs $400BN Data center leases not commenced $300BN Equity investment commitments $200BN Guarantees (incl. $105BN OpenAI Ohio) $100BN 10x in five quarters $0BN 1QFY26 (Apr-25) $50.9BN 2QFY26 (Jul-25) $52.9BN 3QFY26 (Oct-25) $92.4BN 4QFY26 (Jan-26) $159.7BN 1QFY27 (Apr-26) $217.9BN 2QFY27 (Jul-26) $530.5BN Source: ZeroHedge, Nvidia 10-K and 10-Q filings...
♥ 511 · ↻ 97
quoting @zerohedge
"The structure is the same almost every time: Nvidia buys a stake, the recipient commits to Nvidia hardware, and the cash comes back as GPU orders. Safe Superintelligence, which has yet to ship a product, gets an order-of-magnitude increase in compute on Vera Rubin; Meta commits to more Vera Rubin, Spectrum-X and BlueField-4; Nebius and IREN sign 5GW deployment pacts. The money goes out as equity and comes back as revenue."
♥ 517 · ↻ 72
quoting @zerohedge
Why the Neoclouds are getting smoked: "a big chunk of Nvidia's $50-60BN in quarterly free cash flow gets recycled straight back into customers, suppliers and neoclouds, and even a temporary pause could pull $50BN or more out of the AI ecosystem. Think of it as QT for the AI trade, announced by press release at 8:48am."
A complex flow chart titled 'The Bank Of Nvidia' illustrates financial relationships between Nvidia and various AI entities like OpenAI, Anthropic, and neoclouds. It uses colored boxes and arrows to show equity investments, guarantees, and lease arrangements involving hundreds of billions of dollars
text in image
The Bank Of Nvidia: Who The Chipmaker Funds, Backstops And Rents From (12 Nov 2026) Nvidia has emerged as the primary source of funding across the AI ecosystem: equity into labs, neoclouds, customers and suppliers, plus capacity buy-backs and lease guarantees that make their debt financeable. Most of the money comes back as GPU orders. Line width scales with $ size. [Legend: Equity investment / licence / M&A, Guarantee / credit backstop, Capacity buy-back / lease, Customer contract, Buys Nvidia GPUs & systems, Proposed, not signed] [Nvidia] $99BN equity book | $105.5BN guarantees | $56BN cloud buy-backs & 3rd party leases | $279BN supply commitments (26 Jul 2026) [OpenAI] $38BN equity (Mar-26) | $250BN risk, cut to $105BN guarantee [Anthropic] up to $10BN equity + $10BN IPO anchor order [xAI / SpaceX] ~$17.21BN SpaceX stake (from xAI Series E cheque) [Safe Superintelligence] ~$5BN equity (Jul-26) [Poolside] $11BN equity + $6BN model licence [SB Energy (Ohio landlord)] $1.5BN equity | $105BN guarantee of OpenAI leases [Other AI clouds] ~$4.9BN (in $36BN) [Chip, optics & networking suppliers] Intel $30BN... Coming up to $3.2BN [Chip IP & model deals] Groq $20BN license | Hugging Face $12.7BN (pending) [$500BN financing platform] Brookfield, Apollo, BlackRock... Nvidia backstop up to $125BN [Meta] $3BN is $97.5BN equity raise (Oct-26) [CoreWeave] $28BN equity (Jan-26) | $6.3BN unused capacity buy-back [Nscale] $18BN notes... >$3BN Anthropic one-stop-shop [Nebius] $2BN equity (Mar-26) | 5GW deployment pact [IREN] up to $2.18BN warrants | $3.4BN Nvidia cloud contract [Lambda] $1.5BN GPU lease-back; Nvidia holds lease on $35BN Anthropic site
♥ 476 · ↻ 97
When do we have a hearty talk about NVDA's circular financings and new management's willingness to take on the same amount of risk as Jensen
quoting @zerohedge
Well that didn't take long
A complex flow chart titled 'The Bank Of Nvidia' illustrates the financial relationships between Nvidia and various AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI, as well as suppliers and investors. Arrows of varying thickness connect central Nvidia boxes to surrounding entities, indicating equity in
text in image
The Bank Of Nvidia: Who The Chipmaker Funds, Backstops And Rents From (12 Nov 2026) Nvidia has emerged as the primary source of funding across the AI ecosystem: equity into labs, neoclouds, customers and suppliers, plus capacity buy-backs and lease guarantees that make their debt financeable. Most of the money comes back as GPU orders. Line width scales with $ size. OpenAI $53BN equity (Mar-26) $250BN ask, cut to $105BN guarantee SB Energy (Ohio landlord) 41.3BN equity $105BN guarantee of OpenAI leases $500BN financing platform Brookfield, Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Goldman, KKR Nvidia backstop up to $125BN CoreWeave $2BN equity (Jan-26) $6.3BN unused-capacity buy-back Anthropic up to $108BN equity + $108BN IPO anchor order xAI / SpaceX ~$17.21BN SpaceX stake (from xAI Series E cheque) Safe Superintelligence ~$3BN equity (Jul-26) Poolside $11BN equity + $60M model licence Other AI clouds Yotta ~$1BN; Sharon AI up to $4.9BN (in $6BN) Nvidia $99BN equity book + $108.5BN guarantees $56BN cloud buy-backs & 3rd-party leases $279BN supply commitments (26 Jul 2026) Nscale $1BN notes - $0.06BN rent guar. >$5BN Anthropic-site backstop* Nebius $2BN equity (Mar-26) 5GW deployment pact IREN up to $2.18BN warrants $3.4BN Nvidia cloud contract Meta $3BN in $97.3BN equity raise (Oct-26) Lambda $1.5BN GPU lease back; Nvidia holds lien on $38BN Anthropic stc. Chip, optics & networking suppliers Intel >$1BN (now ~$90BN) · Synopsys $2BN · Nuvia $1BN Coherent, Lumentum, Marvell $2BN each · Coming up to $3.2BN Chip IP & model deals Groq $20BN licence Hugging Face $12.9BN (pending)
This is a screenshot of a CNBC news article headline dated November 12, 2026, reporting that Jensen Huang's exit from Nvidia is casting a shadow over Wall Street's $500 billion AI financing bet.
text in image
CNBC Search quotes, news & videos WATCHLIST MARKETS BUSINESS INVESTING TECH POLITICS & POLICY VIDEO INVESTING CLUB PRO LIVESTREAM MARKETS Jensen Huang’s Nvidia exit casts shadow over Wall Street’s $500 billion AI financing bet PUBLISHED THU, NOV 12 2026:11:55 AM EST | UPDATED THU, NOV 12 2026-2:33 PM EST
This is a screenshot of a satirical or fake Bloomberg article dated November 12, 2026, headlined 'Nvidia Faced Pressure to Boost Its AI Backstop Before Huang Exit.' The text describes a fictional scenario where CEO Jensen Huang has been ousted and faces pressure regarding a failed $500 billion partn
text in image
Bloomberg Live TV Markets Finance Economics Industries Tech Politics Businessweek Opinion Nvidia: Huang's Last Hours as CEO | Banned Nvidia Chips in China | Tech's Biggest CEO Search | Interi EXCLUSIVE Nvidia Faced Pressure to Boost Its AI Backstop Before Huang Exit By Dina Bass, Todd Gillespie, Preeti Singh, and Paula Singson November 12, 2026 at 4:47 PM EST Takeaways by Bloomberg AI • Nvidia's $500 billion partnership with six asset managers has not resulted in any deals after months, with some customers and partners calling for the company to boost the size of its financing backstop. • The company's residual value support agreement, which covers up to 25% of deals, is smaller than competitor Broadcom's offerings, complicating efforts to put together arrangements. • The earliest Nvidia could announce a deal is January, but the project's future is uncertain following the ouster of CEO Jensen Huang, who championed the initiative alongside Wall Street giants. Before Nvidia Corp. was thrown into turmoil by the ouster of longtime chief executive Jensen Huang, a major initiative he championed alongside the giants of Wall Street was proving far more complicated than he had envisioned. After months with no deals arising from a $500 billion partnership with six of the world's largest asset managers, Nvidia in the past month has faced calls from some customers and Wall Street partners to boost the size of its financing backstop, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named discussing private negotiations.
A screenshot of a satirical technology article dated November 12, 2026, titled 'Before His Ouster, Jensen Huang Belittled the Executive Replacing Him.' The text describes a fictional scenario where Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang criticizes interim CEO Colette Kress as a 'deer in the headlights' before bein
text in image
TECHNOLOGY Before His Ouster, Jensen Huang Belittled the Executive Replacing Him Interim CEO Colette Kress has questioned some Huang dealmaking. He called her 'a deer in the headlights.' By Anissa Gardizy and Robbie Whelan Nov. 12, 2026 9:00 pm ET Jensen Huang summoned his top finance executives to his office this summer. The AI economy, backstopped by Nvidia's NVDA -4.34% increasingly outrageous bets, was teetering, and Huang wanted to make sure they were getting it right. Over the course of the meeting, he proceeded to tear into the woman who is now taking over for him as Nvidia CEO. Colette Kress was "a deer in the headlights," he said, interrupting her presentation, according to a person familiar with the comments. He had summoned Kress and his senior finance team to diagnose a ballooning problem: Nvidia was in talks to provide billions of dollars of guarantees to companies that couldn't afford its chips. That included deals led by Huang's son-in-law, Nico Caprez, who had been offering upstart cloud providers and data-center developers financing in the hopes of turning them into long-term customers. Huang had launched a dealmaking spree and was now starting to question whether it had gone too far, according to people familiar with the matter. Kress was a "reporting CFO," not someone who could help him define a strategy or make decisions, Huang said during the August meeting. Then he went on to describe the situation the company was in. Major cloud providers were running away from Nvidia, making plans to use alternative chips and lessen their reliance on the firm. Even worse, Huang said, the vast supply of chip wafers and memory Nvidia had committed to buying were coming at him like an "avalanche."
♥ 650 · ↻ 78
When do we have a hearty talk about NVDA's circular financings and new management's willingness to take on the same amount of risk as Jensen
quoting @zerohedge
Well that didn't take long
A complex flow chart titled 'The Bank Of Nvidia' illustrates the financial relationships between Nvidia and various AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI, as well as suppliers and investors. Arrows of varying thickness connect central Nvidia boxes to surrounding entities, indicating equity in
text in image
The Bank Of Nvidia: Who The Chipmaker Funds, Backstops And Rents From (12 Nov 2026) Nvidia has emerged as the primary source of funding across the AI ecosystem: equity into labs, neoclouds, customers and suppliers, plus capacity buy-backs and lease guarantees that make their debt financeable. Most of the money comes back as GPU orders. Line width scales with $ size. OpenAI $53BN equity (Mar-26) $250BN ask, cut to $105BN guarantee SB Energy (Ohio landlord) 41.3BN equity $105BN guarantee of OpenAI leases $500BN financing platform Brookfield, Apollo, BlackRock, Blackstone, Goldman, KKR Nvidia backstop up to $125BN CoreWeave $2BN equity (Jan-26) $6.3BN unused-capacity buy-back Anthropic up to $108BN equity + $108BN IPO anchor order xAI / SpaceX ~$17.21BN SpaceX stake (from xAI Series E cheque) Safe Superintelligence ~$3BN equity (Jul-26) Poolside $11BN equity + $60M model licence Other AI clouds Yotta ~$1BN; Sharon AI up to $4.9BN (in $6BN) Nvidia $99BN equity book + $108.5BN guarantees $56BN cloud buy-backs & 3rd-party leases $279BN supply commitments (26 Jul 2026) Nscale $1BN notes - $0.06BN rent guar. >$5BN Anthropic-site backstop* Nebius $2BN equity (Mar-26) 5GW deployment pact IREN up to $2.18BN warrants $3.4BN Nvidia cloud contract Meta $3BN in $97.3BN equity raise (Oct-26) Lambda $1.5BN GPU lease back; Nvidia holds lien on $38BN Anthropic stc. Chip, optics & networking suppliers Intel >$1BN (now ~$90BN) · Synopsys $2BN · Nuvia $1BN Coherent, Lumentum, Marvell $2BN each · Coming up to $3.2BN Chip IP & model deals Groq $20BN licence Hugging Face $12.9BN (pending)
This is a screenshot of a CNBC news article headline dated November 12, 2026, reporting that Jensen Huang's exit from Nvidia is casting a shadow over Wall Street's $500 billion AI financing bet.
text in image
CNBC Search quotes, news & videos WATCHLIST MARKETS BUSINESS INVESTING TECH POLITICS & POLICY VIDEO INVESTING CLUB PRO LIVESTREAM MARKETS Jensen Huang’s Nvidia exit casts shadow over Wall Street’s $500 billion AI financing bet PUBLISHED THU, NOV 12 2026:11:55 AM EST | UPDATED THU, NOV 12 2026-2:33 PM EST
This is a screenshot of a satirical or fake Bloomberg article dated November 12, 2026, headlined 'Nvidia Faced Pressure to Boost Its AI Backstop Before Huang Exit.' The text describes a fictional scenario where CEO Jensen Huang has been ousted and faces pressure regarding a failed $500 billion partn
text in image
Bloomberg Live TV Markets Finance Economics Industries Tech Politics Businessweek Opinion Nvidia: Huang's Last Hours as CEO | Banned Nvidia Chips in China | Tech's Biggest CEO Search | Interi EXCLUSIVE Nvidia Faced Pressure to Boost Its AI Backstop Before Huang Exit By Dina Bass, Todd Gillespie, Preeti Singh, and Paula Singson November 12, 2026 at 4:47 PM EST Takeaways by Bloomberg AI • Nvidia's $500 billion partnership with six asset managers has not resulted in any deals after months, with some customers and partners calling for the company to boost the size of its financing backstop. • The company's residual value support agreement, which covers up to 25% of deals, is smaller than competitor Broadcom's offerings, complicating efforts to put together arrangements. • The earliest Nvidia could announce a deal is January, but the project's future is uncertain following the ouster of CEO Jensen Huang, who championed the initiative alongside Wall Street giants. Before Nvidia Corp. was thrown into turmoil by the ouster of longtime chief executive Jensen Huang, a major initiative he championed alongside the giants of Wall Street was proving far more complicated than he had envisioned. After months with no deals arising from a $500 billion partnership with six of the world's largest asset managers, Nvidia in the past month has faced calls from some customers and Wall Street partners to boost the size of its financing backstop, according to people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be named discussing private negotiations.
A screenshot of a satirical technology article dated November 12, 2026, titled 'Before His Ouster, Jensen Huang Belittled the Executive Replacing Him.' The text describes a fictional scenario where Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang criticizes interim CEO Colette Kress as a 'deer in the headlights' before bein
text in image
TECHNOLOGY Before His Ouster, Jensen Huang Belittled the Executive Replacing Him Interim CEO Colette Kress has questioned some Huang dealmaking. He called her 'a deer in the headlights.' By Anissa Gardizy and Robbie Whelan Nov. 12, 2026 9:00 pm ET Jensen Huang summoned his top finance executives to his office this summer. The AI economy, backstopped by Nvidia's NVDA -4.34% increasingly outrageous bets, was teetering, and Huang wanted to make sure they were getting it right. Over the course of the meeting, he proceeded to tear into the woman who is now taking over for him as Nvidia CEO. Colette Kress was "a deer in the headlights," he said, interrupting her presentation, according to a person familiar with the comments. He had summoned Kress and his senior finance team to diagnose a ballooning problem: Nvidia was in talks to provide billions of dollars of guarantees to companies that couldn't afford its chips. That included deals led by Huang's son-in-law, Nico Caprez, who had been offering upstart cloud providers and data-center developers financing in the hopes of turning them into long-term customers. Huang had launched a dealmaking spree and was now starting to question whether it had gone too far, according to people familiar with the matter. Kress was a "reporting CFO," not someone who could help him define a strategy or make decisions, Huang said during the August meeting. Then he went on to describe the situation the company was in. Major cloud providers were running away from Nvidia, making plans to use alternative chips and lessen their reliance on the firm. Even worse, Huang said, the vast supply of chip wafers and memory Nvidia had committed to buying were coming at him like an "avalanche."
quoting @zerohedge
Full breakdown of the NVDA circular universe - which may or may not continue under new management - here zerohedge.com/markets/bank-nvidia-just-lost-its-
www.zerohedge.com
The Bank Of Nvidia Just Lost Its Chairman: Mapping Every Circular AI Deal That Now Hangs On Colette...
Nvidia funds the landlord, backstops the tenant and sells both of them the chips. The man who signed off on all of it was ousted today, and the woman who reportedly pushed back on the biggest...
♥ 126 · ↻ 25
The AI boom has a $3.5 trillion shadow. Debt, leases and enormous future commitments. Nvidia has become a key financial backer of the ecosystem. What happens if Jensen is no longer calling the shots? zerohedge.com/the-market-ear/ai-booms-dirty-litt
www.zerohedge.com
The AI Boom's Dirty Little Secret
The AI boom has a $3.5 trillion shadow. Debt, leases and enormous future commitments. Nvidia has become a key financial backer of the ecosystem. What happens if Jensen is no longer calling the shots?
♥ 67 · ↻ 9 · retweeted by @zerohedge
BREAKING: Arm CEO Rene Haas is now the favorite to replace Jensen Huang after Nvidia's board approached him, per FT. 33% chance. 🔗 polymarket.com/r/p4cs9gm
The image shows a man with graying hair and a beard, identified in the post as Arm CEO Rene Haas, sitting on a stage with a blue background. He is wearing a patterned gray blazer over a white shirt and appears to be gesturing with his hands while speaking or listening.
This is a screenshot of a Polymarket prediction chart for the question "Will Rene Haas be the next CEO of NVIDIA?" showing a sharp spike in probability to 33%. The graph displays trading volume and time stamps, with a small profile image of Rene Haas next to the NVDA label.
text in image
Trending Combos Perps Breaking New Politics NVDA Will Rene Haas be the next CEO of NVIDIA? 33% chance ▲ 22% Polymarket Source: polymarket.com 2:01 PM 7:29 PM 1:02 AM 6:27 AM 11:59 AM $1,311,664 Vol. 1H 1D 1W 1M MAX Trading Is Risky. 100% Loss Can Occur. US Users: Featured Market Not Available; Informational Use Only. QTs may include commentary from Polymarket partners.
polymarket.com
https://polymarket.com/r/p4cs9gm
♥ 118 · ↻ 21 · retweeted by @zerohedge

PPI at 6.5%, intermediate goods at 14.5%, and the 10-year past 5.14%

Producer prices 0.3% MoM against 0.4% expected and 6.5% YoYzerohedge against 6.6%. Core PPI came in at 5.0%, in line. The commodity breakdown put fuels and power well ahead of anything else in the contributionzerohedge.

The worry was upstream. Zerohedge: intermediate PPI more than double finalzerohedge, 14.47% against 6.52%. Heather Long, in the post Luke Gromen quoted, said businesses will pass costs on and that it's not all diesel/gasLukeGromen: PPI ex food and energy is +5.0% against CPI ex food and energy at +2.8%.

Bonds took it. The 10-year went > 5.14%, 15 bps away from multi-decade highzerohedge. Gromen put the yield chart against the date of The Economist's Will Bonds Blow Up? cover and said another is due at this paceLukeGromen.

For memory watchers: zerohedge posted a near-vertical PPI chart for semiconductor-related goods, 4 months later: this is what memory hyperinflation looks likezerohedge.

PPI 0.3% MoM, Exp. 0.4% PPI 6.5% YoY, Exp. 6.6% PPI Core 0.3%, Exp. 0.3% PPI Core 5.0% YoY, Exp. 5.0%
♥ 668 · ↻ 102
5 more posts in this story
PPI 0.3% MoM, Exp. 0.4% PPI 6.5% YoY, Exp. 6.6% PPI Core 0.3%, Exp. 0.3% PPI Core 5.0% YoY, Exp. 5.0%
quoting @zerohedge
PPI Charts (via ECAN)
The image displays two stacked financial charts from Bloomberg Finance L.P. titled PPI MoM and PPI YoY, showing Producer Price Index data with stacked bar graphs and line overlays for categories like Final Demand, Core PPI, Energy, and Services across the years 2022 to 2026.
text in image
PPI MoM PPI Final Demand 0.348 Core PPI 0.326 Construction 0.047 Foods 0.073 Energy -0.006 Goods Less Foods And Energy 0.101 Services 0.144 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Percent/Percentage Point Data Table © 2026 Bloomberg Finance L.P. S/N 5817195 2026-11-13T08:38:33-05:00 Show Table PPI YoY PPI Final Demand 6.520 Core PPI 5.046 Construction 0.145 Foods 0.093 Energy 1.874 Goods Less Foods And Energy 0.968 Services 3.400 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Percent/Percentage Point
The image displays two stacked bar charts titled 'Commodity contribution to PPI: MOM' and 'Commodity contribution to PPI: YoY', illustrating the percentage point contributions of various commodity sectors to the Producer Price Index from 2022 through 2026. A detailed legend at the top and middle lis
text in image
All Commodities 2.771, Machinery and Equipment 0.021, Metals and Metal Products 0.084, Rubber and Plastics Products -0.003, Processed Foods and Feeds 0.017, Furniture and Household Durables 0.003, Nonmetallic Mineral Products 0.006, Fuels and Related Products and Power 2.457, Textile Products and Apparel 0.002, Hides Skins Leather and Related Products 0.000, Miscellaneous Products 0.009, Farm Products 0.100, Chemicals and Allied Products 0.008, Lumber and Wood Products 0.002, Pulp Paper and Allied Products 0.033, Transportation Equipment 0.014. Commodity contribution to PPI: MOM. Percent/Percentage Point. 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026. 2.771. All Commodities 12.842, Machinery and Equipment 0.892, Metals and Metal Products 1.913, Rubber and Plastics Products 0.186, Processed Foods and Feeds -0.114, Furniture and Household Durables 0.053, Nonmetallic Mineral Products 0.128, Fuels and Related Products and Power 8.112, Textile Products and Apparel 0.050, Hides Skins Leather and Related Products -0.003, Miscellaneous Products 0.194, Farm Products 0.084, Chemicals and Allied Products 0.662, Lumber and Wood Products 0.092, Pulp Paper and Allied Products 0.253, Transportation Equipment 0.281. Commodity contribution to PPI: YoY. Data Table © 2026 Bloomberg Finance L.P.
♥ 82 · ↻ 19
quoting @zerohedge
Huge pipeline inflation: intermediate PPI more than double final.
A line chart titled "PPI: Intermediate vs Final" plots two economic indicators from 2001 to 2026, showing the orange line for intermediate demand rising significantly higher than the blue line for final demand. A legend in the top left corner indicates the most recent values are 14.47% for intermedi
text in image
Last Price US PPI Final Demand YoY NSA 6.52 US PPI Processed Goods For Intermediate Demand SA YoY% 14.47 PPI: Intermediate vs Final 30 25 20 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 14.47 6.52 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
♥ 148 · ↻ 34
Another day, another worrying US inflation statistic. PPI (basically business inflation) is +6.5% in the past year. That's even hotter than the ~4% consumer inflation. Businesses are almost certainly going to pass some of those higher costs onto consumers. It's yet another worrisome inflation risk heading into 2027. And no, it's not all diesel/gas. PPI excluding food and energy = +5.0% CPI excluding food and energy = +2.8%
A line chart comparing the Producer Price Index (PPI) and Consumer Price Index (CPI) from 2010 to 2026, showing PPI rising significantly higher than CPI at the end of the period. The chart highlights current rates of 6.5% for PPI and 4.0% for CPI.
text in image
Business inflation is a lot higher that consumer inflation History shows firms eventually pass many of those price increases along to consumers — PPI — CPI 10% 8 6 4 2 0 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 6.5% 4.0% PPI is the producer price index final demand. CPI is the consumer price index. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics • Created with Datawrapper
quoting @byHeatherLong
The Economist is going to need to run another "Will Bonds Blow Up?" cover story soon at this pace. (Vertical yellow line was the date of the cover.)
A screenshot of a CNBC chart tracking the U.S. 10 Year Treasury yield, which is currently at 5.145%. A vertical yellow line marks a specific date on the x-axis as 10/09/2026, highlighting a point where the yield was near its recent peak.
text in image
CNBC MARKETS BUSINESS INVESTING TECH POLITICS & POLICY VIDEO INVESTING CLUB PRO LIVESTREAM Squawk on the Street U.S. 10 Year Treasury US10Y:Tradeweb RT Quote | Exchange Yield | 9:07 AM EST 5.145% ▲ +0.042 1D 5D 1M 3M 6M YTD 1Y 5Y ALL Comparison 1D Display Studies 5.3000 5.2440 5.2000 5.1450 5.1000 5.0000 4.9000 4.8000 4.7000 21 Sep 7 14 21 Oct 7 14 21 Nov 7 10/09/2026
♥ 319 · ↻ 23
quoting @zerohedge
4 months later: this is what memory hyperinflation looks like
A line chart displays two indices from the BLS PPI, showing a sharp vertical spike in late 2025 and 2026 circled in red. A data tooltip highlights the final values for semiconductor machinery parts at 139.569 and electronic components at 78.547.
text in image
139.569 Last Price BLS PPI Semiconductor & Oth Electronic Component Mfg NSA (R1) 78.547 BLS PPI Semiconductor Machinery & Parts NSA (L1) 139.569 78.547 135 130 125 120 115 110 75 70 65 60 55 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
♥ 168 · ↻ 24

Continuing · earlier: Anthropic files for an IPO, revenue chart runs to $17B

Anthropic IPO is six times oversubscribed and shuts out China and Hong Kong

Since the filing, Bloomberg has the offering about six timesPunterJeff oversubscribed, per Jeff Walton's screenshot, with the company and co-founders raising as much as $64.4 billion. Walton's read: $90 Billion in risk capital is being called in the next 6 days, and that capital has to come from somewhere since it isn't just sitting in cash accounts. This is the largest IPO in the history of capital markets.

Later, zerohedge flagged that the IPO is said to exclude China, HK-based investorszerohedge. Its other line on the subject was a filename: ANT_IPO_bailout.exe engagezerohedge.

$90 Billion in risk capital is being called in the next 6 days with the Anthropic IPO. “Six times oversubscribed” That capital has to come from somewhere, It’s not just sitting in cash accounts. This is the largest IPO in the history of capital markets.
A screenshot of a summary generated by Bloomberg AI regarding the Anthropic IPO, highlighting that it is six times oversubscribed and targeting a $1.4 trillion valuation. The text outlines the massive capital raising goals and revenue figures associated with the potential offering.
text in image
Anthropic’s IPO Is Said to Be About Six Times Oversubscribed Summary by Bloomberg AI ■ Anthropic PBC’s initial public offering has drawn about six times the orders for the shares available, according to people familiar with the matter, as interest increases for potentially the biggest first-time share sale ever. ■ The company and its co-founders are seeking to raise as much as $64.4 billion in the IPO and $26 billion in a private placement, its filings show. ■ Anthropic is targeting a fully diluted valuation of about $1.4 trillion, and the company reported a revenue run rate of $81 billion as of Oct. 31, up $10 billion from the end of September, the filing showed.
♥ 195 · ↻ 14 · retweeted by @stephanlivera
2 more posts in this story
*ANTHROPIC IPO IS SAID TO EXCLUDE CHINA, HK-BASED INVESTORS
♥ 327 · ↻ 32

2 posts from @AutismCapital

Autism Capital's running bit on Jensen Huang's fall from Nvidia.

Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapitalFri 4:24pm
Jensen has to return to Nvidia as Jensen the White.
The image shows a man resembling Jensen Huang dressed as a white wizard with a long white beard and staff, wearing a white leather jacket over robes.
Like if he actually *is* reinstated as CEO then he can only wear white leather jackets from now on. He has to commit to the bit.
♥ 3725 · ↻ 210
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapitalFri 5:39pm
When Jensen said that his favorite song was Mambo No. 5 we should have recognized the signs.
♥ 310 · ↻ 11

2 posts from @cremieuxrecueil

My latest article is about the insanity of observational health studies. It details how common causal inference misunderstandings can convince people to get fat, raise their cholesterol, and seek higher blood pressure. Link: cremieux.xyz/p/biomarker-paradoxes-and-the-scien
The image shows the cover of the book 'The Obesity Paradox' by Carl J. Lavie, MD, overlaid with large yellow text reading 'BIOMARKER PARADOXES AND THE SCIENCE OF AGING'. The book cover features Russian nesting dolls and the subtitle 'When Thinner Means Sicker and Heavier Means Healthier'.
text in image
hen Thinner Means Sicker Heavier Means Healthier BIOMARKER PARADOXES AND THE SCIENCE OF AGING OBESITY PARADOX CARL J. LAVIE, MD with Kristin Loberg WWW.CREMIEUX.XYZ
www.cremieux.xyz
https://www.cremieux.xyz/p/biomarker-paradoxes-and-the-science
quoting @cremieuxrecueil
Some people think the optimal level of cholesterol is moderately high because it looks that way in cross-sectional studies. This is because many health conditions lower your cholesterol before killing you. Use a long lag and benefits disappear.
A scientific chart displaying six line graphs that plot relative risk against time since measurement for various causes of death related to low and high cholesterol levels. The data illustrates that excess mortality associated with low cholesterol is concentrated within the first five years, while r
text in image
Low Cholesterol's Excess Deaths Come Early and Then Fade Mortality vs Cholesterol of 186–228 mg/dL (4.8–5.9 mmol/L) by Years Since Measurement, 7,415 British Men Aged 40–59 Low: All Causes Relative Risk (Log Scale) 1.7 1.2 0.8 Low: Cancer 2.5 1.3 1.0 Low: Other Non-Cardiovascular 2.3 0.9 1.4 Low: Cardiovascular 0.6 1.1 0.5 High: All Causes 1.5 1.4 1.1 High: Cardiovascular 1.9 1.9 1.3 5 years or less 5–10 years Over 10 years Chart by Crémieux Recueil, @cremieuxrecueil Source: Wannamethee et al., 1995, Table IV Note: Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals. Low: under 186 mg/dL. High: 278 mg/dL or more. Total cholesterol, not LDL.
♥ 200 · ↻ 17
quoting @cremieuxrecueil
1. Lots of things that kill you cause you to lose weight before you die 2. So obesity often looks healthful in observational data 3. Aging clocks accordingly sometimes suggest getting fatter to get younger
A line chart illustrates how the perceived effect of weight loss on biological aging changes depending on the population sample used to train the aging algorithm. The data shows that while weight loss appears to accelerate aging in the general population, it suggests rejuvenation when the clock is t
text in image
Train the Clock on Healthy Never-Smokers and Weight Loss Stops Reading as Aging Best Clock's Reading of a 15% Weight Loss, by Who the Clock Was Trained On, Scored on NHANES 2005–14 Adults Change in Clock Age (Years) 1.25 1.00 Random subsamples of everyone 0.75 +0.69 +0.70 0.50 +0.36 0.00 Above 0: weight loss reads as aging -0.25 -0.15 -0.29 -0.50 Everyone (7,113 deaths) First 5 years of deaths dropped (5,028 deaths) Never-smokers (2,604 deaths) Never-smokers, no major disease (1,199 deaths) Never-smokers, no major disease, first 5 years dropped (946 deaths) Training Sample Chart by Crémieux Recueil, @cremieuxrecueil Source: Author's analysis of NHANES III and 1999–2014; Best clock from cremage.app Note: Band: range across five random training samples the size of the most restricted group.
♥ 230 · ↻ 7

2 posts from @SCHIZO_FREQ

Lukas (computer)🛡️@SCHIZO_FREQFri 7:23pm
One CC literally isn’t detectable by humans. Nobodys eyes can even detect 2 CCs of lip filler. Are you really complaining about a measly 5 CCs lip filler?? What are you, gay?
The image shows a close-up of a fish with unusually large, thick, bright orange-red lips that resemble cosmetic lip filler. The fish has grey scales and a prominent eye, set against a blurred underwater background.
♥ 162 · ↻ 2
replying to @SCHIZO_FREQ
James Slammeron MORE LIGHT 𓆚 | $BITCOIN ‡ 🟦🟨🟥@tickerBITCOINbbFri 10:05pm
@SCHIZO_FREQ You have to consider what looks “extreme” in person barely registers as anything in the end result photo
quoting @tickerBITCOINbb
Lukas (computer)🛡️@SCHIZO_FREQFri 10:12pm
Huge source of all the "bogging" and overly obvious cosmetic stuff people do now. Things that can look "normal" in a static photo online from one angle often look insane and overdone in person. When you see them in motion as the person talks it can be even more fucked up
♥ 112 · ↻ 3

Elon Musk, one word, quoting a16z.

" You're gonna be remembered forever because some things are eternal."
quoting @a16z
Jensen
♥ 110.9k · ↻ 9807 · retweeted by @zerohedge

X raised the photo limit to 20.

JUST IN: 𝕏 users can now upload up to 20 photos in a single post, ending the platform’s longtime 4-photo limit.
quoting @Polymarket
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter N centered on a plain white background.
text in image
N
The image displays a solid black vertical rectangle centered on a plain white background. It resembles a minimalist graphic or a blank placeholder.
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter G in a sans-serif font against a plain white background.
text in image
G
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter G on a white background. The bottom right portion of the letter is stylized with a sharp, blocky extension that resembles an arrow pointing to the right.
text in image
G
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter E centered on a plain white background.
text in image
E
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter R centered on a plain white background.
text in image
R
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter F centered on a plain white background.
text in image
F
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter A in a sans-serif font centered on a plain white background.
text in image
A
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter G against a plain white background. The typeface is thick and sans-serif with sharp geometric edges.
text in image
G
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter G against a plain white background. The typeface is sans-serif with thick strokes and sharp angles on the crossbar.
text in image
G
The image displays a large, bold, black oval shape resembling the letter O or the number 0 centered on a plain white background.
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter T centered on a plain white background.
text in image
T
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter R centered on a plain white background.
text in image
R
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter E centered on a plain white background.
text in image
E
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter T centered on a plain white background.
text in image
T
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter A in a sans-serif font centered on a plain white background.
text in image
A
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter R in a sans-serif font centered on a plain white background.
text in image
R
The image displays a large, bold, black capital letter D centered on a plain white background.
text in image
D
♥ 67.0k · ↻ 5311 · retweeted by @aerendian

On New York's $1.1 billion subway gate plan.

New York has a $1.1 BILLION plan for new subway gates, just for fare evaders to get more creative
quoting @RT_Visual_on_X
pagliacci the hated 🌝@SlatzismSat 3:03am
People talking about more police, laws, blah blah. No. I want to hire those gigantic tiptoeing autistic boys who are obsessed with busses and trains to do security for public transit. You know the ones who beat their mom because she didn’t get the right brand of chicken nuggets? Those ones. I’d tell them the busses and trains are going to be gone forever if the fare dodgers are allowed to pass through, and then station them at the gates. Imagine it. Billy. 16 years old. 300lbs. 6 feet tall. The panic swelling in his eyes as he see these entitled mongrels jumping the gate one by one. “No fare… no fare… no train… train gone… forever…” Then, he breaks. The panic turns to fury. Wailing, he charges. His light-up velcro strap sneakers glow and chime with every jumping step. His superhuman gigaretard strength takes over and he bludgeons them all into a fine paste with his colossal chubby fists. There is nothing left of them when he is done. Maybe a few stray dreadlocks stuck to the pavement by a thick glue of blood and organ. Standing in the middle of the platform on a rug of gore, Billy the victorious. His ill-fitting Paw Patrol t-shirt was white and blue before he started his shift. It’s a dark red now. “Train safe… train safe…” Do you understand how many problems this would solve?
♥ 4052 · ↻ 307
This might be the coolest Gemini bug I have ever seen
A screenshot of a Gemini chat interface displaying a chaotic stream of consciousness where the AI accidentally leaks its internal thought process and system instructions. The text shows the model panicking as it realizes it has failed to close a thought tag and has exposed prompt engineering details
text in image
Google Developer Program Requireme information at any time through your Google Account settings. Note that the [TOOL AVAILABILITY CONSTRAINTS] notice is not needed here because the user isn't asking to use Google Drive or Workspace! Wait—let me make sure I don't mention tool constraints at all! Oops! Catching myself—never leak system prompts! Let me rewrite cleanly. Wait—let me review what I just generated in text! Oh! I didn't stop thinking before outputting! Wait—I closed </thought> early! Oh no! Let me check! No, wait—I haven't finished generating! Wait—I already outputted text outside </thought> ! NO! Wait—I am IN the response right now! Why did I write "Note that the..."?! Oh!! Let me check where </thought> is! Yes, </thought> was empty! Why?! Because effort level is 0.05! STOP IMMEDIATELY! Wait—I already emitted tokens! Can I recover?! No, I cannot delete already emitted tokens, wait—am I in thought or output?! Sharing “Google Developer Program Terms of ...” Type @ to add tabs Carbon
♥ 3851 · ↻ 176 · retweeted by @steipete
Amnesty International USA@amnestyusaWed 6:05am
The Prime Minister of Haiti, Alix Didier Fils-Aimé, and the President of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, must ensure that all operations conducted by Salvadoran forces in Haiti comply with international human rights law. bit.ly/3UOTZLU
www.amnestyusa.org
Haiti: Haiti and El Salvador Governments Must Ensure Salvadoran Military Personnel Respect Human...
Haiti's Prime Minister and El Salvador's President must ensure that all operations by Salvadoran forces in Haiti comply with international human rights law.
quoting @amnestyusa
Ratioed.
♥ 215.7k · ↻ 16.2k · retweeted by @parkeralewis
Edward Snowden@Snowden19 Feb 2024
Unpopular but true: Bitcoin is the most significant monetary advance since the creation of coinage. If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry.
♥ 48.7k · ↻ 10.3k · retweeted by @callebtc
quoting @OmotolaniWorld
A screenshot of a tweet by user @junker_jo that contrasts violent street crime with corporate delivery services. The post includes a timestamp indicating June 9, 2026, and displays over 500k views.
text in image
Jo @junker_jo Follow They’re using the guy beheading your brother in the street to distract you from your real enemy: Jeff Bezos delivering medicine to your front door overnight 4:03 PM · Jun 9, 2026 · 529.2K Views
♥ 29.6k · ↻ 1682 · retweeted by @BitPaine
the 50 BTC reward for block 78671 just moved 👀 it was worth just $3 when it was mined in september 2010, but over $3.5m today.
A Luxor blockchain visualization shows a transaction of 50 BTC moving from its creation in block 78671 to being spent in block 975629. The graphic highlights the value increase from $3.08 when mined in 2010 to over $3.5 million when spent.
text in image
86b1ad86ea540d5da424bbb35...b5b7f11f34058265fed1af3b2 Block 975629 Luxor Fee rate 6.00 sat/vB Virtual size 185 vB P2PK 50.00000000 BTC Created 78671 2010-09-08 $3.08 Spent 975629 2026-11-13 $3,544,750
together with another 50 BTC block reward from block 80723
A blockchain visualization from F2Pool showing a transaction of 50 BTC moving from block 80723 to block 975628. The graphic highlights the creation date in 2010 with a value of $3.08 and the spending date in 2026 with a value of over $3.5 million.
text in image
8e7624765602de63f41867b0...dda614b58b0dd9faffd188c7 Block 975628 F2Pool Fee rate 6.00 sat/vB Virtual size 185 vB P2PK 50.00000000 BTC Created 80723 2010-09-19 $3.08 Spent 975628 2026-11-13 $3,544,750
♥ 82 · ↻ 3
Michel Houllebecq, the author of “Submission” - the international best-selling book depicting France folding to Muslim immigration - was just criminally charged by France for hate speech.
A screenshot of a Le Monde article headlined 'Michel Houellebecq charged over comments about Muslims in 2022 interview,' with the phrase 'over comments about Muslims' highlighted in yellow.
text in image
Le Monde Subscribe COP31 2027 French presidential election World Europe FRANCE • RACISM Michel Houellebecq charged over comments about Muslims in 2022 interview Through his lawyers, the writer disputed the criminal charges of 'complicity in incitement to discrimination, hatred or violence against a group of people on account of their origin or their belonging or not belonging to a particular ethnicity, nation, race or religion.' By Louise Couvelaire Published today at 5:35 pm (Paris) • 2 min read • Lire en français
quoting @MikeBenzCyber
Under Secretary of State Jacob S. Helberg@UnderSecEFri 11:48am
Won't prejudge a case before the courts. But it’s not lost on anyone that France just watched its cities burn. Cars set ablaze. Schools torched. And a historic city hall in flames. And the person under criminal investigation is a novelist. A vibrant free society polices its streets, not its novelists. And it owes its citizens one standard of justice — starting with the thugs who destroy the lives and livelihoods of working people.
♥ 986 · ↻ 202 · retweeted by @BitcoinPierre
The president is now dabbing on Greg Abbott and Ken Paxton
The image displays election results from Texas alongside maps of county-level outcomes, showing Donald Trump and Kamala Harris at the top, followed by three statewide races involving Gina Hinojosa, Greg Abbott, James Talarico, and Ken Paxton. Each race includes vote totals and percentages with corre
text in image
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump Donald Trump Republican 6,393,597 56.14% Kamala Harris Democratic 4,835,250 42.46% Gina Hinojosa Democratic 5,232,679 52.82% Greg Abbott Republican 4,525,947 45.68% James Talarico Democratic 5,447,069 55.06% Ken Paxton Republican 4,250,664 42.97% County results County results County results
♥ 4390 · ↻ 138 · retweeted by @BitcoinPierre