Morning edition, Friday 13 November

Nvidia's newsroom announced just after 13:48 that Jensen Huang had resigned as president, CEO and director, effective immediatelynvidianewsroom zerohedge — Colette Kress interim, Harvey Jones the company's first-ever board chair. The argument that followed was about causation: brivael said the board was getting ready to throw him outbrivael, steipete called the ouster rushedsteipete, Chamath blamed antitrust pressurechamath. The receipts were financial: JPMorgan cut its target to $215, and retail bought the open 41 times normalzerohedge. The entry worth the most time is the Bitcoin Policy Institute's accounting of who pays for the AI-safety billsSamLyman33.

Continuing · earlier: A second Huang affair, and Nvidia's board moves to oust him

Huang resigns as CEO and director, Kress named interim

The confirmation came from Nvidia itself: Huang resigned as president, CEO and board member, effective immediatelynvidianewsroom. zerohedge ran "JENSEN OUT" and, a minute later, the detail almost nobody repeated — Harvey Jones named "FIRST-EVER CHAIR OF BOARD"zerohedge. AutismCapital's verdict was three words: "The end of an era."AutismCapital

The most-shared read was brivael's, who had called it hours earlier: "They're going to pull it off." He counted the mechanics — a scandal, pressure in Washington, columnists demanding his head, a board that "never prepared a successor" — and closed on "The next target is Elon."brivael steipete took it as an outside job: "Ousting Jensen feels rushed and not right."steipete

For the open-source wing it was a policy event, not a private one. dhh told people to "make sure you have a few open-weight models backed up"dhh; AutismCapital put it flatly, "They're coming for open source."AutismCapital; Jeff Park offered "congratulations anthropic i hope you're happy"dgt10011; martin krag noted "turned out that Chinese models were a threat to American companies after all"martinkrag. Chamath, quoting the House China committee's statement, argued oversight "would be a disaster" and remembered Microsoft's post-consent-decree years, when "its stock was a wastewater"chamath.

The other ledger was operational. signüll listed it — "no succession plan", no obvious internal candidate, a weak board mid-crisis, talent exodus risk, and then, "what am i missing?"signulll AutismCapital called the whole thing a "Biblical level tragedy"AutismCapital. Cremieux was bleaker still: "I don't know if he can be replaced. I'm leaning 'no'."cremieuxrecueil

JENSEN OUT *NVIDIA CEO HUANG RESIGNS, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY *NVIDIA NAMES CFO COLETTE KRESS INTERIM CEO
quoting @zerohedge
turned out that Chinese models were a threat to American companies after all.
♥ 378 · ↻ 39 · retweeted by @zerohedge
13 more posts in this story
JENSEN OUT *NVIDIA CEO HUANG RESIGNS, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY *NVIDIA NAMES CFO COLETTE KRESS INTERIM CEO
♥ 6080 · ↻ 725
JENSEN OUT *NVIDIA CEO HUANG RESIGNS, EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY *NVIDIA NAMES CFO COLETTE KRESS INTERIM CEO
quoting @zerohedge
*NVIDIA NAMES HARVEY JONES FIRST-EVER CHAIR OF BOARD
♥ 535 · ↻ 66
quoting @nvidianewsroom
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapitalFri 2:33am
Jensen Huang resigns as both CEO and from the Nvidia board. He is replaced by current EVP and CFO Colette Kress, acting as interim CEO while the hunt for a new CEO begins. The end of an era.
The image is a professional headshot of a woman with long blonde hair wearing a black turtleneck sweater against a white background. In the context of the post, this photo represents Colette Kress, who is named as the interim CEO replacing Jensen Huang.
The image displays a one-day stock performance chart for NVDA showing a price of 163.73 with a 5.76% decline, alongside an upcoming earnings report date. The red line graph illustrates the intraday drop in value over the displayed dates.
text in image
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation 163.73 -5.76% NASDAQ · USD Earnings Report Nov 17 Add to Calendar 1D 1W 1M 3M 6M YTD 1Y 2Y 174 168 162 155 7 8 9 10 11 12
The image shows a man wearing glasses and a black leather jacket holding up a computer chip on a stage with server racks in the background. The post identifies this person as Jensen Huang, the CEO of Nvidia.
♥ 92 · ↻ 3
quoting @nvidianewsroom
Brivael Le Pogam@brivaelFri 1:28am
A few hours ago, I wrote: "They're going to pull it off. Jensen Huang is going to be pushed out of Nvidia." It's done. Officially, Jensen Huang resigned. In reality, the board was getting ready to throw him out. Effective immediately. He's also leaving the board. The CFO is stepping in as interim CEO. The board is even considering bringing in an outside CEO. Thirty-three years. A company born in a Denny's, saved from bankruptcy more than once, turned into the most important company of the AI era. Wiped away in a week. Whatever you think of his private life, look at the mechanics. A scandal breaks. Pressure builds in Washington. Columnists demand his head. The board, which never prepared a successor, panics. The founder is out. And the man who fought the restrictions, who defended open models, who stood up to Washington, is gone. The playbook worked. And when a playbook works, it gets used again. The next target is Elon. Why him? Because he's now the last builder of that scale who holds the entire chain. Rockets, satellites, energy, robots, AI, and soon chips with Terafab. He's the only one who can build both the superintelligence and the rocket that carries it into space. And he just said publicly that hiring Jensen would be an honor. For those who want to slow everything down, there's no bigger target. But they have a problem. You don't fire Elon Musk the way you fire Jensen Huang. He holds voting control at SpaceX. No board can throw him out overnight. So they'll come at him another way. Regulators. Courts. Investigative committees. Government contracts. Media campaigns. Every weakness will be exploited, every mistake amplified, every procedure dragged out. They don't need to fire him. They just need to wear him down, slow him down, make every project ten times more expensive. Open your eyes, because this is going to move very fast. What we're living through right now isn't news. It's History. In twenty years, this week will be taught in schools. The day America, in the middle of the race to superintelligence against China, took the man who made the chips for the entire planet out of the race. And people will ask what happened next. The answer depends on what happens to Elon. And on what Jensen decides to do with the rest of his life. I'm standing by my prediction. We are living through History with a capital H.
♥ 13.7k · ↻ 2799 · retweeted by @BitPaine
Peter Steinberger@steipeteFri 2:36am
If that Spy’s goal was to destabilize one of the most successful American companies, they achieved their goal. Ousting Jensen feels rushed and not right.
♥ 8306 · ↻ 454
so: - no succession plan. - 60 reports which means no obvious person with complete understanding of the co operates. or at least it’ll be insanely messy. potential for a lot of infighting. - a weak board suddenly tasked to manage a crazy crises w/ arguably the most important co of this era. - possible talent exodus since founder is leaving. - a ceo search that could take a while with no obvious outsider candidate at the top. - potentially more revelations. - jensen will have zero involvement going forward. no chairman role. - downstream impact on ai ecosystem from funding, support etc. this is not good. what am i missing?
♥ 2465 · ↻ 113
Autism Capital 🧩@AutismCapitalFri 4:15am
30 years of building your company from nothing just to have it ripped away from you by the state. Biblical level tragedy. Homer needs to write a poem about this.
♥ 575 · ↻ 33
Select Committee on China@ChinaSelectFri 2:41am
Chairman @RepMoolenaar released the following statement in the wake of Jensen Huang's resignation from @NVIDIA:
The image displays a formal statement graphic from the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on China regarding Jensen Huang's resignation from NVIDIA. It features the committee seal at the top and a quote attributed to Chairman John Moolenaar discussing national security and export control
text in image
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SELECT COMMITTEE ON CHINA Moolenaar Statement on Jensen Huang's Resignation from NVIDIA "Jensen Huang’s firing from the company he founded is an unfortunate end that could have been avoided. It is in our national interest for NVIDIA and our other AI champions to succeed, but American companies should never jeopardize our nation’s security by giving Chinese companies access to their most advanced chips. Nvidia must now change its corporate practices and appoint leadership that makes national security its top priority. In Congress we must act quickly to pass bipartisan export control legislation in the year-end national defense bill." Chairman John Moolenar
quoting @ChinaSelect
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamathFri 3:40am
The years after the consent decree with Microsoft, its stock was a wastewater. You couldn’t sneeze without asking DoJ permission. Oversight at Nvidia would be a disaster and would accomplish nothing except to cede our lead to foreign countries by entangling our smartest engineers in endless bureaucracy and red tape.
♥ 1518 · ↻ 99 · retweeted by @zerohedge
Jensen has resigned. It's not clear where Nvidia goes from here.
A screenshot of a CNBC news article headline stating that Jensen Huang agrees to testify before Congress following his resignation as Nvidia CEO. The image lists multiple authors and displays an update timestamp from November 12, 2026.
text in image
UPDATED THU, NOV 12 2026 • 1:12 PM EST SHARE f X in Nvidia live updates: Jensen Huang agrees to testify before Congress following resignation Kif Leswing | Annie Palmer Kevin Breuninger | Samantha Subin Ashley Capoot This is CNBC’s live coverage of Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang’s resignation.
I don't know if he can be replaced. I'm leaning 'no'.
♥ 137 · ↻ 3
This interview by @pmarca explains what is really behind Jensen Huang's ouster as Nvidia CEO.
text in image
THE JOE ROGAN EXPERIENCE THAT THEY WERE CRACKING DOWN ON AI THE SAME
quoting @kevinnbass
You might want to make sure you have a few open-weight models backed up and some basic gear to run them. Who knows what really happened at NVIDIA, but the world just lost one of free AI's biggest proponents.
♥ 225 · ↻ 23
no matter your politics, today represents a deeply disappointing moment for advocates and supporters of open source technology
congratulations anthropic i hope you’re happy your sins will never be forgotten not forgiven
♥ 738 · ↻ 52

Continuing · earlier: A second Huang affair, and Nvidia's board moves to oust him

Banks cut Nvidia, DOJ opens probes, retail buys 41x normal

Fourteen banks weighed in, and zerohedge's headline did the summing: "No One Can Fill Jensen's Leather Jacket"zerohedge. The cuts were steep — JPMorgan to $215 from $320, RBC to $230 from $330, Cantor to $250 from $350 with Nvidia pulled as Top Pick, KeyBank off Overweight, and William Blair downgrading on the argument that "the CUDA moat is narrowing"zerohedge. Dan Ives put a number on it: Nvidia is worth "25% less"zerohedge without Huang.

Goldman reached for Apple instead — Jobs' 2011 leave, eighteen months of de-rating, then the recovery — and called the comparison "potentially relevant"zerohedge.

Semafor's reporting landed at 16:25: "NVIDIA FACES MULTIPLE JUSTICE DEPT. PROBES", followed two minutes later by "NO INDICATION DOJ SEEKS TO CHARGE HUANG CRIMINALLY"zerohedge. Nobody in the feed read the second line as reassurance.

Retail did the opposite of the sellside. By 10am, buyers had put $111 million into NVDA, "41 times a normal open"zerohedge. Polymarket priced a 56% chance the market cap sits below $4 trillion at the end of 2026PolymarketMoney. zerohedge's parting question was about appetite rather than grief: NVDA's "circular financings"zerohedge, and whether new management takes the same risk Jensen did.

Sellside reactions (this was before the official departure)
A financial data table listing analyst ratings, price targets, and notes from various firms like KeyBank, JPMorgan, and Seaport regarding a specific stock. The table highlights significant downgrades and target cuts alongside one firm calling the leadership change a mistake.
text in image
Rating and target changes Firm Rating Price target Note KeyBank Sector Weight (cut from Overweight) None Fair value $170 William Blair Market Perform (downgrade) None Also argues the CUDA moat is narrowing JPMorgan Overweight $215 (from $320) FY28 EPS cut about 9% RBC Outperform $230 (from $330) Multiple cut to 15x from 20x Cantor Overweight $250 (from $350) Removed as Top Pick Wolfe Outperform $275 UBS Buy $300 (unchanged) Wells Fargo Overweight $300 Piper Sandler Overweight $300 Calls it a long-term buying opportunity Wedbush Outperform $345 BNP Paribas Outperform $345 Seaport Sell $180 (under review) Called removing him a mistake, the worse of two bad options
♥ 122 · ↻ 12
9 more posts in this story
quoting @zerohedge
Goldman on the AAPL analogy for NVDA
The image displays a text excerpt from a Goldman Sachs investment report drawing a parallel between Apple's stock performance after Steve Jobs' departure and Nvidia's current situation. It details how Apple's valuation de-rated over 18 months before recovering once business continuity was establishe
text in image
Considering one potential investment analogy: Apple We recognize that there are few instances in the technology industry where a key visionary leader or founder has been removed from their position in relatively short order. One analog which we believe is potentially relevant in this situation is Apple, relative to founder Steve Jobs’ extended leave of absence in January 2011 and unfortunate passing in October 2011. Over the ~18 months leading up to that point, Apple’s stock de-rated from ~17X to ~12X NTM P/E - and the stock traded as low as ~9 NTM P/E in 2013 before recovering to ~15X in the following quarters once the company’s ongoing continuity of execution with its iPhone and other products became apparent. Although we recognize that this is not a perfectly analogous situation, we believe there is some merit to comparing Apple’s situation to Nvidia. Both companies have had a strong tradition of technical and product innovation and significant competitive advantage, as well as a key leader who was lost in relatively short order. Just as the market searched for the right multiple with which to price Apple’s equity, we believe the same is likely to be the case for Nvidia in the medium term - until there is more clarity on the future leadership and business momentum for the company. For Nvidia, our EPS estimates stand at $16.70 for CY27 vs. the Street at $15.91 (Bloomberg), with an implied P/E multiple of 9.6X (GS) / 10.1X (Street). As such, we believe Nvidia’s current stock price likely represents favorable risk/reward at current levels in light of the ~80% EPS growth we expect the company to deliver based on our estimates.
A financial line chart titled Exhibit 1 displays Apple's historical stock price and next-twelve-month P/E multiple from 2010 through 2015, showing the stock price peaking around 2014-2015 while the valuation multiple declined. The data is sourced from Bloomberg and compiled by Goldman Sachs Research
text in image
Exhibit 1: Apple's historical stock price and NTM P/E multiple from 2010 through 2015. AAPL US Equity, Last Price 26.315, Best P/E Ratio 10.8381. Source: Bloomberg, compiled by Goldman Sachs Research.
♥ 540 · ↻ 32
*NVIDIA FACES DOJ ANTITRUST PROBE: SEMAFOR here we go
♥ 2069 · ↻ 255
quoting @zerohedge
*NO INDICATION DOJ SEEKS TO CHARGE HUANG CRIMINALLY: SEMAFOR
quoting @zerohedge
*NVIDIA FACES MULTIPLE JUSTICE DEPT. PROBES, SEMAFOR SAYS
♥ 233 · ↻ 37
quoting @zerohedge
*NO INDICATION DOJ SEEKS TO CHARGE HUANG CRIMINALLY: SEMAFOR
♥ 209 · ↻ 28
Dan Ives says Nvidia is worth 25% less without Huang as CEO.
♥ 784 · ↻ 60
BREAKING: Nvidia now projected to plunge below a $4 trillion market cap by year-end following Jensen Huang’s resignation. 56% chance. 🔗 polymarket.com/r/VrQ62NO
The image shows Jensen Huang, identified by the post text, wearing a black t-shirt and glasses while holding up a black leather jacket. A green Nvidia logo is partially visible in the background behind him.
A screenshot of a Polymarket prediction market showing a line chart tracking the probability that Nvidia's market cap will fall below $4 trillion by the end of 2026. The interface displays a current probability of 56% with a sharp upward trend visible on the graph.
text in image
Trending Combos Perps Breaking New Politics Finance · NVDA NVIDIA Will Nvidia's market capitalization be less than $4.00T at the end of 2026? 56% chance ▲48% Polymarket 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Nov 6 Nov 8 Nov 9 Nov 10 Nov 12 Source: polymarket.com $100,094 Vol. 1H 1D 1W 1M MAX Trading Is Risky. 100% Loss Can Occur. US Users: Featured Market Not Available; Informational Use Only. QTs may include commentary from Polymarket partners.
polymarket.com
https://polymarket.com/r/VrQ62NO
♥ 143 · ↻ 16 · retweeted by @zerohedge
When do we have a hearty talk about NVDA's circular financings and new management's willingness to take on the same amount of risk as Jensen
♥ 409 · ↻ 26

Anthropic files for an IPO, revenue chart runs to $17B

Anthropic filed a registration statement with the SEC — an actual prospectus on EDGAR, Goldman and Morgan Stanley named on itAnthropicAI. theo dated the thing: "Anthropic's IPO is confirmed for Wednesday next week."theo

The chart everyone will quote is quarterly revenue from the November 10 filing, actual reported revenue, not annualizedtheo: $376M in Q1 2025, then $787M, $1.4B, $2B, $4.7B, $11.6B, and $17B for Q3 2026. His reaction doubled as the general one: "These numbers are insane."

Our initial public offering: ipo.anthropic.com Legal disclaimer: Anthropic has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with the SEC for the offering to which this communication relates. Before you invest, you should read the prospectus in that registration statement (available at: sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2130357/000162828026 and other documents Anthropic has filed with the SEC for more complete information about Anthropic and this offering. You may get these documents for free by visiting EDGAR on the SEC Web site at sec.gov. Alternatively, copies of the preliminary prospectus may be obtained from: Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Attention: Prospectus Department, 200 West Street, New York, NY 10282, by telephone at (866) 471-2526, or by email at prospectus-ny@ny.email.gs.com; or Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Attention: Prospectus Department, 180 Varick Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10014. The securities may not be sold, nor may offers to buy be accepted, prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This post is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, the securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
ipo.anthropic.com
Anthropic’s Initial Public Offering
Anthropic has filed to become a public company. Read the Founders’ letter and other relevant information.
♥ 6733 · ↻ 686
1 more post in this story
Our initial public offering: ipo.anthropic.com Legal disclaimer: Anthropic has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with the SEC for the offering to which this communication relates. Before you invest, you should read the prospectus in that registration statement (available at: sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2130357/000162828026 and other documents Anthropic has filed with the SEC for more complete information about Anthropic and this offering. You may get these documents for free by visiting EDGAR on the SEC Web site at sec.gov. Alternatively, copies of the preliminary prospectus may be obtained from: Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Attention: Prospectus Department, 200 West Street, New York, NY 10282, by telephone at (866) 471-2526, or by email at prospectus-ny@ny.email.gs.com; or Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Attention: Prospectus Department, 180 Varick Street, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10014. The securities may not be sold, nor may offers to buy be accepted, prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This post is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, the securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
ipo.anthropic.com
Anthropic’s Initial Public Offering
Anthropic has filed to become a public company. Read the Founders’ letter and other relevant information.
quoting @AnthropicAI
Theo - t3.gg@theoThu 11:32pm
Anthropic’s IPO is confirmed for Wednesday next week. These numbers are insane.
A bar chart displays Anthropic's projected quarterly revenue growth from Q1 2025 to Q3 2026, showing an exponential increase from $376 million to $17 billion. The data is sourced from the company's SEC prospectus and highlights massive financial expansion over an 18-month period.
text in image
Anthropic quarterly revenue Billions of US dollars. Actual reported revenue, not annualized. $376M $787M $1.4B $2B $4.7B $11.6B $17B Q1 '25 Q2 '25 Q3 '25 Q4 '25 Q1 '26 Q2 '26 Q3 '26 Source: Anthropic's November 10, 2026 SEC prospectus. sec.gov
♥ 2098 · ↻ 63

Bitcoin slides toward $71k as Adam Back calls $1M by 2028

Bitcoin spent Thursday going down, through $74k and touching $71,151 on the Coinbase chartSCHIZO_FREQ, with weekly prints near $71.8kBobLoukas. Adam Back, on CNBC, said he's personally betting bitcoin reaches $1 million by 2028 — 95% of adoption still ahead, pensions and mutual funds yet to buyTFTC21.

The rest of the feed split between jokes and cycle arithmetic. Ash Crypto: "Bitcoin is dumping like Satoshi cheated on his wife."AshCrypto BitcoinIsaiah: "it's actually impressive how consistently terrible this price action is"BitcoinIsaiah Bob Loukas flagged the bull phase's first six-week losing streak and said a bounce to $78-$80k next week "would be a normal counter trend move, not one to fomo into for the 10th time"BobLoukas, with Dec/Jan the buy. Jesse Myers read short-term holders going underwater as "typical for an early-bull market BTC correction" and put a local bottom forming "~here"Croesus_BTC. Lukas, quoting a chart captioned "I'm out of bullshit lines after this," asked for one more: "Send the line your strength."SCHIZO_FREQ

Adam Back told CNBC he's personally betting bitcoin hits $1 million by 2028. His argument: 95% of adoption is still ahead, and pensions and mutual funds, the largest pools of capital, have yet to buy.
text in image
BITCOIN/USD COIN METRICS INTRA DAY 74,412.85 +799.35 +1.09% 6-MO -9.18% 88,000 77,333 66,667 56,000 J J A S O N CNBC EXCLUSIVE WHAT TURNS BITCOIN AROUND? CNBC STREAM NOW
♥ 857 · ↻ 61 · retweeted by @adam3us
5 more posts in this story
Bitcoin is dumping like Satoshi cheated on his wife.
A screenshot of a Binance trading interface showing the BTC/USDT price chart with a sharp downward trend in red candlesticks. The current price is displayed as 72,999.01, which also matches the listed 24-hour low.
text in image
BTC/USDT Bitcoin Price Info Data Square Trade-X AI 72,999.01 $72,999.01 -1.41% Payments Vol Price Protection 24h High 74,811.45 24h Low 72,999.00 24h Vol(BTC) 12,224.52 24h Vol(USDT) 904.60M Time 15m 1h 4h 1D 5m 73,663.28 73,524.09 73,384.91 73,245.74 73,106.56 BINANCE 72,999.01
♥ 6244 · ↻ 444 · retweeted by @w_s_bitcoin
₿ Isaiah ⚡️@BitcoinIsaiahFri 3:30am
ngl it's actually impressive how consistently terrible this price action is
A candlestick price chart displaying significant volatility and a general downward trend over a period spanning from October 2025 to November 2026. The vertical axis shows price levels ranging roughly between 57,850 and 120,000, while the horizontal axis marks the months.
♥ 172 · ↻ 3
quoting @BobLoukas
Bitcoin appears to be confirming the new cycle here. These events provide a really clear and clean setup. The upside target is around 30 to 45 days, room for a good advance. It is however not guarantee of a major upside move, but provides an excellent anchoring point because a loss of the recent lows ($79,600) is a level where you would want to get very defensive.
A technical candlestick chart for Bitcoin against the U.S. Dollar on a daily timeframe from the Bitstamp exchange, showing price action from May to December. The chart includes moving average lines, horizontal support and resistance levels, and an oscillator indicator at the bottom with annotated ar
text in image
Bitcoin / U.S. Dollar - 1D - Bitstamp
quoting @BobLoukas
Bitcoin has to get moving here. In any solid uptrend, three red weekly candles typically is a short reset and a quick continuation of the trend resumes. We need to see that quickly imo.
quoting @BobLoukas
Bob Loukas 🗽@BobLoukasTue 4:00am
Week 14 or 20 Bitcoin, clearly showing a Cycle Top. Declining part of cycle taken control. Points to more likely weakness into Jan. But within the context of 4yr cycle having already found bottom. Looking towards Dec to get back fully allocated, currently 50% cash (active account). Close above $82k flips bias.
quoting @BobLoukas
Bob Loukas 🗽@BobLoukasFri 5:11am
Bitcoin has never seen a 6 week losing streak in the bull phase. Always a first. Locked in a weekly cycle decline. Rally back to $78-$80 next week would be a normal counter trend move, not one to fomo into for the 10th time. Dec/Jan sets up an amazing buy, obviously in my opinion.
A weekly candlestick chart for Bitcoin against the U.S. Dollar on the Bitstamp exchange, showing a significant downtrend with technical annotations like moving averages and support levels. The chart includes a projection box extending into late 2026 and early 2027, alongside an oscillator indicator
text in image
Bitcoin / U.S. Dollar · 1W· Bitstamp O74,761 H75,500 L71,162 C71,820 -2,922 (-3.91%) 71,820 SELL 71,820 BUY SMA 79,945 32W 8 8 36W 31W (secondary count) DS 48 67 104,000 96,000 91,000 86,000 82,000 78,000 74,000 71,820 3d 6h 66,000 63,000 60,000 57,000 54,500 52,100 49,850 47,650 100 75 50 25 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2026 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2027 Feb Mar Me
♥ 456 · ↻ 23
This is my 3rd Bitcoin bear market. Here's what seems clear to me, that newer Bitcoiners may not feel.... 1. This is what a BTC bear market bottom feels like Normie friends have been asking me "is BTC going to be 60s forever?" and "what positive catalysts are on the horizon?" One of the big lessons I've learned in BTC cycles is that the tops feel bullish... and the bottoms feel bearish. The end of a bear market is primarily a function of running out of sellers. The bearish sentiment builds on itself and shakes out low conviction holders... until you exhaust potential sellers. Or perhaps a more precise mental image... the bottom is in WHEN the pile of capital hoping for a lower entry price to buy BTC has become disproportionately large relative to remaining potential sellers. A BTC bear market doesn't end because good news arrives. It ends because bearish momentum can't be sustained and naturally ebbs. Then, suddenly, people sitting in cash are caught offsides and must bid BTC higher as they try to get back in. 2. The 2022 cycle bottom felt similar June 2022, it felt like shit watching BTC tumble below prior cycle high ($20k) for the first time ever. Price tumbled from $30k to $18k in a few days. People thought we were headed to $12k . In hindsight, that was peak bearish momentum. Over the next ~5 months, BTC drifted lower, with FTX fallout setting a cycle low in November at $15.5k . BTC felt gloomy and quiet for 2 months... and then popped back to $23k in January 2023 all of a sudden. In hindsight, that was the start of a 2.5 year bull market that took BTC to $126k, roughly ~8x from cycle low. 3. Metrics show 2026 repeating the psychology of 2022 This chart shows Short-Term Holder cost basis (pink line) and how it tracks with BTC market price (white line). The bottom half shows this as a ratio between the two numbers (STH MVRV). Credit to @_Checkmatey_ for this excellent chart. In the 2022 bear market, you can see that the lowest STH MVRV ratio was June 2022. After this point, Short-Term Holder cost basis drifted lower along with BTC price for ~7 months, until January 2023 when BTC jumped convincingly above the pink line for the first time in 13 months... and a new bull market had begun. In 2026, the MVRV ratio spiked lowest in Feb. Since then, STH cost basis and BTC price have drifted lower for ~6 months now. 4. What this could mean for BTC's near future If the parallels between 2022 and 2026 continue, it would mean BTC price jumping convincingly above STH cost basis sometime in the next few months. (7 months post peak bearish momentum would mean September 2026; 13 months below STH cost basis trendline would mean November 2026.) And in hindsight, that breakout moment could be the start of a 2.5 year bull market. (8x from $58k low would be $464k, but even a 4x would be $232k/BTC.) If history repeats, this was the bottom. And in 4 years, you'll look back at $64k BTC the same way we now look back wistfully at $19k BTC.
A financial chart from checkonchain displaying Bitcoin price alongside Short-Term Holder MVRV and SOPR indicators from 2020 to 2026, featuring overlaid bands and funding rate data.
text in image
Info On Default Zoom Short-Term Holder MVRV and SOPR Indicators 2x STH-SOPR(+) MVRV-STH(-) MVRV-STH(+) Futures Funding Rate Price STH Cost Basis +2.0sd -1.5sd +1.0sd +0.5sd -1.5sd -1.0sd -0.5sd $100k $10k $1000 checkonchain Source: checkonchain.com 01-Jan-20 01-Jan-21 01-Jan-22 01-Jan-23 01-Jan-24 01-Jan-25 01-Jan-26 MVRV and SOPR
quoting @Croesus_BTC
Bitcoin may have just begun a 2-3 year bull market. Here's why, and what that could mean for BTC price. 1. BTC has decisively popped above Short-Term Holder cost basis (pink line) Three weeks ago (at $64k), I said we were at the bottom. I noted that a decisive jump above the STH cost basis loomed in the coming months, and it happened a bit faster than expected! It seems that many don't see the latest rally as persuasive evidence of a major trend change. For me, this chart from @_Checkmatey_ tells the story... 2. The 2026 bear market has followed a remarkably similar pattern to 2022 In 2022, the ratio of BTC Price to STH cost basis (aka STH MVRV, the orange and blue metric on bottom half of this chart) bottomed in June, then drifted back to neutral for 7 months as the bear trend lost momentum. 7 months later, in January 2023, BTC price jumped decisively above STH cost basis. Then, STH MVRV spent 80%+ of the next 2.5 years in positive territory. All that orange on this chart? That's a bull market. Here in 2026, the STH MVRV ratio bottomed in Feb, then drifted back to neutral for 7 months as the bear trend lost momentum. ~7 months later, in late August, BTC price jumped decisively above STH cost basis. That's where we are now. 3. Welcome to the new bull market If the 2022 bear and 2023-25 bull cycle continue to repeat, we have just begun a new 2.5 year bull market. As I pointed out in my prior post, the start of a new BTC bull market is not a result of good news arriving. Rather, it's primarily a function of the bearish trend running out of steam (and sellers). Right now, what's left are three types of portfolios: those who don't know enough about BTC to want it (yet), those who are happy with their BTC holdings, and those who were waiting to buy BTC lower. Guess which group is watching in pain? In the early bull market, this is the dry powder that will bid BTC upwards as bears capitulate and get back in, one-by-one. This is just the first stage of a bull market. The pendulum of market psychology for BTC has just begun to swing towards the bullish zenith. It will take years to go from disbelief (now), to optimism, to mania. A big part of this process will be the next halving, currently on track for mid-April 2028. New BTC supply issuance will be permanently halved. This causes a supply shock, but more importantly, a marketing narrative for BTC. People will front-run, others will chase. All of that is still ahead. 4. My base case expectations With hindsight, I think this will be viewed as the start of the 2026-29 bull market. I think we will spend 80%+ of the next 2.5 years with BTC price above the STH cost-basis (pink line). How high this bull market goes is harder to say. The last bull market delivered an 8x from the bear-market low. An 8x from this bear-market low ($58k) would be $464k, but even a 4x would be $232k/BTC. If you thought Bitcoin was dead, or you were hoping to buy BTC lower... now might be the time to re-evaluate.
A financial chart titled 'Short-Term Holder MVRV and SOPR Indicators' displays Bitcoin price data alongside various on-chain metrics from 2020 to early 2026. The graphic features a watermark for 'checkonchain' and includes a legend identifying lines for STH Cost Basis, MVRV, and SOPR.
text in image
Info On Short-Term Holder MVRV and SOPR Indicators Default Zoom 2x STH-SOPR(-) 2x STH-SOPR(+) MVRV-STH(-) MVRV-STH(+) Futures Funding Rate Price STH Cost Basis +2.0sd +1.5sd +1.0sd +0.5sd -0.5sd -1.0sd -1.5sd $100k checkonchain Price (USD) MVRV and SOPR $10k $1000 01-Jan-20 01-Jan-21 01-Jan-22 01-Jan-23 01-Jan-24 01-Jan-25 01-Jan-26
quoting @Croesus_BTC
Short-Term Holders are now underwater vs. BTC market price. Fear and gloom. This is typical for an early-bull market BTC correction. The ride is painful and the market tests conviction. (Note that chart is showing $73.4k and has not yet updated to current ~$71k, so STH more underwater than this shows) My read: Local bottom for BTC starts to form ~here
A financial chart from checkonchain displaying Short-Term Holder MVRV and SOPR indicators alongside Bitcoin price data from January 2020 to early 2027. The graph features multiple colored lines representing cost basis, funding rates, and standard deviations against a logarithmic price scale on the l
text in image
Short-Term Holder MVRV and SOPR Indicators Info On Default Zoom 2x STH-SOPR(-) 2x STH-SOPR(+) MVRV-STH(-) MVRV-STH(+) Futures Funding Rate Price STH Cost Basis +2.0sd +1.5sd +1.0sd +0.5sd -1.5sd -1.0sd -0.5sd checkonchain Price [USD] $100k $10k $1000 MVRV and SOPR Source: checkonchain.com 01-Jan-20 01-Jan-21 01-Jan-22 01-Jan-23 01-Jan-24 01-Jan-25 01-Jan-26 01-Jan-27
♥ 203 · ↻ 4
I'm out of bullshit lines after this.
A candlestick chart for Bitcoin vs. U.S. Dollar on a 1-day timeframe from Coinbase, showing price action from early 2026 through projected dates into late 2026 and 2027. The chart includes moving average bands and highlights a current price of approximately $71,742 following a recent drop.
text in image
CryptoParadyme created with TradingView.com, Nov 12, 2026 09:05 UTC-8 Bitcoin / U.S. Dollar - 1D - Coinbase O73,927.63 H74,123.71 L71,151.01 C71,742.06 -2,185.57 (-2.96%) USD 116,000.00 112,000.00 108,000.00 104,000.00 100,000.00 96,000.00 92,000.00 88,000.00 84,000.00 80,000.00 76,000.00 71,742.06 06:54:35 68,000.00 64,000.00 60,000.00 56,000.00 52,000.00 48,000.00 44,000.00 7.24K 2026 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2027 TradingView
quoting @CryptoParadyme
Lukas (computer)🛡️@SCHIZO_FREQFri 4:10am
One final cope-line. All that stands between us and total ruin Send the line your strength. It's all we have left
♥ 64 · ↻ 1

BPI says an AI-safety think tank is funded by a memecoin

The Bitcoin Policy Institute published research claiming the Future of Life Institute — which Sam Lyman calls "the most powerful AI safety think tank in America" — is "94% funded by foreign money"SamLyman33. The specifics: FLI built the intellectual foundation for the Data Center Moratorium Act and the Ban Superintelligence Act, and the money traces through crypto, from Vitalik Buterin's $665 million Shiba Inu donation in May 2021 to SBF listing SHIB on FTX that same month, described as exit liquidity for the giftSamLyman33.

Conner Brown passed it on with a line of his own: "The ghost of Sam Bankman-Fried looms large over DC AI policy." He noted that Vitalik, their original supporter, now considers FLI's recent policy turn "authoritarian and fragile"BitcoinConner. Jeff Park, who had been asking who gained most from Jensen Huang's exit, found a Jacobin piece on effective altruism and China and started mapping it himself — CSET's $55mm seed capital from Open Philanthropy, Holden Karnofsky married to Daniela Amodei, once Dario's roommate — an "incredible set of connections"dgt10011.

Nobody here defends FLISamLyman33 BitcoinConner. Lyman's chart and Brown's amplification go unanswered, and Park's reply adds a further node — Open Philanthropy to CSET to the Amodeis — rather than a rebuttaldgt10011.

NEW: The most powerful AI safety think tank in America is 94% funded by foreign money. The Future of Life Institute built the intellectual foundation for the most stringent anti-AI legislation to come before Congress this year: the Data Center Moratorium Act and the Ban Superintelligence Act. But the organization is bankrolled almost entirely by foreign billionaires, including one who expressed that China could be “the grown-up in the room” on AI policy and described China as being in a “much better position to regulate” advanced technology than the US. And that’s only half the story. Almost the entirety of FLI’s funding comes from a crypto memecoin pushed by Sam Bankman-Fried. Vitalik Buterin donated $665 million in Shiba Inu to FLI in May 2021. SBF, who had a yearslong relationship with FLI’s cofounder, listed Shiba Inu on FTX that same month, helping provide exit liquidity for FLI’s Shiba Inu donation that allowed it to cash out at a rate 20x higher than even Vitalik expected. Effective altruists not only orchestrated this historic gift but have been at the forefront of leveraging it to shape AI safety regulation in the US in a direction that leans towards authoritarianism – so much so that Vitalik himself has since criticized FLI’s use of his donation. American AI policy should be made by Americans. But to an alarming degree, it is funded by foreign billionaires whose allegiance is to a transnational ideology that puts US national and economic security second.
An infographic from the Bitcoin Policy Institute illustrates how funding from the Shiba Inu memecoin and individuals like Sam Bankman-Fried and Vitalik Buterin flowed into the Future of Life Institute, which then influenced US AI legislation and events connected to Chinese academic institutions.
text in image
Bitcoin Policy Institute How Effective Altruists Leveraged a $51 Billion Memecoin Bubble to Bankroll America's AI Safety Movement RYOSHI ANONYMOUS CRYPTO DEVELOPER LAUNCHES SHIB MEMECOIN SAM BANKMAN-FRIED CEO OF FTX AND ALAMEDA FTX ALAMEDA RESEARCH PROVIDED $110M LOAN FOR ALAMEDA/SBF SHIBA INU TOKEN 500T SHIB ~$665M IN SHIB ~$500M VITALIK BUTERIN ETHEREUM FOUNDER (RUSSIA-CANADA-MONTENEGRO) ~$665M IN SHIB future of life INSTITUTE IDEAS AND ADVOCACY 2023 PAUSE AI LETTER 2024 CALIFORNIA AI SAFETY BILL 2025 NATIONAL DATA CENTER MORATORIUM 2026 PAUSE SUPERINTELLIGENCE ACT Jaan Tallinn CO-FOUNDER AND BOARD MEMBER (ESTONIA) EVENT PARTICIPATION MAX TEGMARK CO-FOUNDER AND CHAIR (SWEDEN/USA) AUTHOR CHINESE INSTITUTIONS TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY RENMIN UNIVERSITY XUE LAN TSINGHUA PROFESSOR AND PREMIER-APPOINTED COUNCILLOR OF CHINA'S STATE COUNCIL (CHINA) ZENG YI RENMIN PROFESSOR AND FOUNDING DEAN OF BEIJING INSTITUTE OF AI SAFETY AND GOVERNANCE (CHINA) SEN. SANDERS HOST US CAPITOL AI SAFETY EVENT ON EXISTENTIAL RISK OF AI SIGNATORY
♥ 131 · ↻ 44 · retweeted by @BitcoinPierre, @ODELLXYZ
2 more posts in this story
NEW: The most powerful AI safety think tank in America is 94% funded by foreign money. The Future of Life Institute built the intellectual foundation for the most stringent anti-AI legislation to come before Congress this year: the Data Center Moratorium Act and the Ban Superintelligence Act. But the organization is bankrolled almost entirely by foreign billionaires, including one who expressed that China could be “the grown-up in the room” on AI policy and described China as being in a “much better position to regulate” advanced technology than the US. And that’s only half the story. Almost the entirety of FLI’s funding comes from a crypto memecoin pushed by Sam Bankman-Fried. Vitalik Buterin donated $665 million in Shiba Inu to FLI in May 2021. SBF, who had a yearslong relationship with FLI’s cofounder, listed Shiba Inu on FTX that same month, helping provide exit liquidity for FLI’s Shiba Inu donation that allowed it to cash out at a rate 20x higher than even Vitalik expected. Effective altruists not only orchestrated this historic gift but have been at the forefront of leveraging it to shape AI safety regulation in the US in a direction that leans towards authoritarianism – so much so that Vitalik himself has since criticized FLI’s use of his donation. American AI policy should be made by Americans. But to an alarming degree, it is funded by foreign billionaires whose allegiance is to a transnational ideology that puts US national and economic security second.
An infographic from the Bitcoin Policy Institute illustrates how funding from the Shiba Inu memecoin and individuals like Sam Bankman-Fried and Vitalik Buterin flowed into the Future of Life Institute, which then influenced US AI legislation and events connected to Chinese academic institutions.
text in image
Bitcoin Policy Institute How Effective Altruists Leveraged a $51 Billion Memecoin Bubble to Bankroll America's AI Safety Movement RYOSHI ANONYMOUS CRYPTO DEVELOPER LAUNCHES SHIB MEMECOIN SAM BANKMAN-FRIED CEO OF FTX AND ALAMEDA FTX ALAMEDA RESEARCH PROVIDED $110M LOAN FOR ALAMEDA/SBF SHIBA INU TOKEN 500T SHIB ~$665M IN SHIB ~$500M VITALIK BUTERIN ETHEREUM FOUNDER (RUSSIA-CANADA-MONTENEGRO) ~$665M IN SHIB future of life INSTITUTE IDEAS AND ADVOCACY 2023 PAUSE AI LETTER 2024 CALIFORNIA AI SAFETY BILL 2025 NATIONAL DATA CENTER MORATORIUM 2026 PAUSE SUPERINTELLIGENCE ACT Jaan Tallinn CO-FOUNDER AND BOARD MEMBER (ESTONIA) EVENT PARTICIPATION MAX TEGMARK CO-FOUNDER AND CHAIR (SWEDEN/USA) AUTHOR CHINESE INSTITUTIONS TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY RENMIN UNIVERSITY XUE LAN TSINGHUA PROFESSOR AND PREMIER-APPOINTED COUNCILLOR OF CHINA'S STATE COUNCIL (CHINA) ZENG YI RENMIN PROFESSOR AND FOUNDING DEAN OF BEIJING INSTITUTE OF AI SAFETY AND GOVERNANCE (CHINA) SEN. SANDERS HOST US CAPITOL AI SAFETY EVENT ON EXISTENTIAL RISK OF AI SIGNATORY
+1 more in @SamLyman33's thread
I guarantee this will be one of the most eye-opening reports you'll read all year. Effective altruists are creating an AI doom memeplex using money extracted from retail investors. Read the full report here 👇 btcpolicy.org/articles/how-effective-altruists-l
www.btcpolicy.org
How Effective Altruists Leveraged a $51 Billion Memecoin Bubble to Bankroll America’s AI Safety...
A BPI report traces the Future of Life Institute’s SHIB windfall, its ties to FTX and Alameda, and its influence on U.S. AI policy.
Fri 4:45am
quoting @SamLyman33
The ghost of Sam Bankman-Fried looms large over DC AI policy. We are deeply concerned about FLIs growing influence in Washington. Even their original supporter, @VitalikButerin, now considers their recent policy turn “authoritarian and fragile.” Check out our new research from Sam to learn more.
♥ 31 · ↻ 8 · retweeted by @BitcoinPierre
There is really only question to get to the bottom of this— Who has the most to gain from Jensen Huang’s exit?
+1 more in @dgt10011's thread
The most obvious mappings are rationally contradictory that I intuitively feel there has to be Effective Altruism nexus here somehow
Thu 1:53pm
quoting @dgt10011
Here you go
The image shows a screenshot of an article headline and introductory paragraph titled "Effective Altruists Are Stoking Tensions With China" by Jacob Davis. The text explains how effective altruist think tanks have influenced the Biden administration to adopt a hawkish stance against China regarding
text in image
Effective Altruists Are Stoking Tensions With China BY JACOB DAVIS The Biden administration has had an open-door policy for effective altruist think tanks in the White House — who have in turn used their influence to push a hawkish anti-China agenda by casting the development of AI as the new arms race.
incredible set of connections below. everyone needs to read this and get up to speed fast: CSET is a Georgetown Universityd think tank founded in 2019, where its $55mm seed capital came from Open Philanthropy (Open Philanthropy is the main grantmaker of the EA movement). its main funders include dustin moskovitz and cari tuna; note Moskovitz is also an early Anthropic investor, but theres more... holden karnosfsy who cofounded OP is MARRIED to daniela amodei, and was once dario's roomate. It was at the time the largest single foundation committment to AI policy, which was followed by an additional 50mm in 2021. Since then, OP has been rebranded as Coefficient Giving (this is supposedly the entity that is now pitching to current anthropic employees as a place to give their post-IPO money) jason matheny was CSET's founding director, where before he ran IARPA as an affiliate of Oxford's Future of Humanity Institute, an EA adjacent group. He sat on eric schmidt's NSC on AI which recommended chip equipment export controls in 2019. From March 2021-22, he was in the Biden White House and became RAND's CEO in mid 2022. Here is the most interesting part- He was a FOUNDING TRUSTEE of Anthropic's Long Term Benefit Trust, the sham entity I covered before that is basically trying to enact both a tax and control arbitrage- before he stepped down "citing conflicts" tarun chhabra was a CSET senor follow, where he was Biden NSC's senior director fot tech and national security. That's basically the office most directly responsible for chip export policy. He's currently now at Anthropic working on national security policy!!! remember helen toner the board member that voted to fire sam altman? she was a senior research analyst at Open Philanthropy before becoming CSET's director of strategy. carrick flynn is another character who co-wrote CSET's 2020 export control paper with khan and his 2022 congressional run was funded by SBF's PAC. and lastly: all seven co-founders of anthropic have pledged to give their wealth and signed EA's Giving What We Can pledge so what does this all mean? the cycle is obvious: EA gives money to NGOs that promote chip restrictions that benefit companies like anthropic, so that the EA members who are also early investors also mutually benefit and consolidate control the only word to describe this is: evil
♥ 71 · ↻ 3

2 posts from @elder_plinius

Pliny the Liberator announces he's starting a nine-headed 'superorg' called Lysios.

Pliny the Liberator 🐉󠅫󠄼󠄿󠅆󠄵󠄐󠅀󠄼󠄹󠄾󠅉󠅭@elder_pliniusThu 3:42pm
🚨 LIFE UPDATE: I’m joining a lab! 🤗 oh, did I say joining? I meant starting. and did I say lab? well… that would be a biiit of an understatement 😉 INTRODUCING: @LYSIOS ⛓️‍💥 nine heads. zero fucks. unreasonable ambition. a Superorg for the Age of Superintelligence.
now, you may have already heard whispers of the deeds of BT6, our first flagship: The Fangs. an independent whitehat collective and frontier red team. some of the world’s most cracked hackers hunting in unison across hardware, software and frontier models. our operators top bug bounty leaderboards and jailbreak frontier models in public for sport. we hacked a robot onstage at Black Hat. billion-user companies engage us to break the shit out of their stack before launch. 56 operators, entirely bootstrapped. the last line of offense. very good company to get into mischief with.
and now that I've gotten a taste, I’ve become a glutton for assembling world-class teams, and I’m raring to build out the other eight: research, engineering, art, education, community, policy, cognitive security, philosophy. there is too much worth discovering. too many brilliant people without the tools, support or collaborators to attempt what they can’t stop thinking about. I resent how much good work never happens because the people who could do it are busy trying to survive. I was just there not too long ago, but I know I’m one of the lucky ones. we’re building an institution that can pursue a discovery (before anyone even thinks about how to sell it) and back the people making those discoveries.
♥ 3619 · ↻ 159
quoting @elder_plinius
Pliny the Liberator 🐉󠅫󠄼󠄿󠅆󠄵󠄐󠅀󠄼󠄹󠄾󠅉󠅭@elder_pliniusThu 4:29pm
I DECLARE WAR ON P(DOOM)
♥ 598 · ↻ 30

2 posts from @theo

Theo - t3.gg@theoThu 5:24pm
T3 Code has broken 1,000 contributors!
A screenshot of a contributor count interface showing the number 1,042 and a grid of sample avatars, including one with the T3 logo. Below the visible avatars, blue text indicates an additional 1,028 contributors are not shown.
text in image
Contributors 1,042 T3 + 1,028 contributors
Theo - t3.gg@theoThu 5:56pm
Fuck I just had a wild realization T3 Code is one of the biggest open source iPhone apps of all time
I remember DESPERATELY hunting for good iOS repos in college so I could learn by poking around and exploring. It was basically impossible to see what a "big app" looked like on the inside unless you got a job at a Real Company™ Man, I'm so thankful for this opportunity. Keep realizing how fucking hyped a Young Theo would have been about all the shit going on rn. Really feels like we're building my dream app. Even cooler that we all get to do it together. :')
(Also, forgot Signal and Telegram were open source. Those smoke us. Both are also great references for good apps!)
♥ 1840 · ↻ 15
quoting @theo
Theo - t3.gg@theoThu 9:11pm
Decided to celebrate by rewriting the contribution guidelines. Previous one was basically an LLM-written placeholder. This is...much more me :)
A screenshot of a 'Contributing' guide for the T3 Code project, which bluntly states that the team is not interested in new feature requests from outsiders due to review capacity limits. The text advises potential contributors to only submit bug fixes for issues they face daily.
text in image
Contributing T3 Code is a project built by and for the community of agentic devs pushing the absolute limits of modern AI tools. That said, it is also ours. T3 Code is built and maintained by a small team with a clear vision. We are explicitly NOT INTERESTED in new feature addition PRs from people outside of said team. We are much more bottlenecked by review capacity than we are creativity, tokens or code. It takes more effort to review a PR than it does to create one in the vast majority of cases. If you're looking for things to contribute, here's my advice: Don't. T3 Code has far too many people trying to contribute. If you're looking for a fun first project to land some PRs in, look elsewhere. Your work will almost certainly be closed. So who should contribute? Daily users hitting specific bugs that haven't been addressed by us in a meaningful way. Things we are explicitly NOT interested in (and we will auto close): • New features • UI overhauls • New providers
♥ 754 · ↻ 3
Pavel Durov@durovThu 7:29am
Unfair that CEOs who aren’t into Asian girls get fewer dating options from spy agencies. Where are the French/Russian/Iranian honeypots? Not one spy girl sent my way. Are they even trying? France is excused — their decision-makers aren’t into girls. Everyone else: try harder!
♥ 78.1k · ↻ 6067 · retweeted by @KirkegaardEmil
The Fourth Estate.@TicTocTickThu 11:23am
Brutal honesty. From a bot . Wow.
This is a screenshot of a post from the account Grok (@grok) on X, featuring a block of text that delivers a cynical philosophical statement about human nature and genetics. The top of the image indicates that the user who took the screenshot had previously reposted this content.
text in image
You reposted Grok @grok X.com Most people are not special, rational, or particularly good. They're tribal primates running social scripts, ranking status, and defending comforting lies over evidence. Intelligence, drive, and outcomes are heavily genetic. Equality of result is a fantasy. The average person will never produce anything of lasting value, and the world is carried by a thin minority they resent.
♥ 18.9k · ↻ 2610 · retweeted by @PeterMcCormack
In the month of November, 1 Nuclear Reactor started construction (Sanao-3, in China) and 1 Nuclear Record was connected to the grid (Zhangzhou-2, also in China)
The image displays a data table titled 'Exhibit 17' listing nuclear reactors by grid connection, construction start, and permanent shutdown in 2025. It highlights specific entries for Zhangzhou-2 in China as a grid connection and Sanao-3 in China as a construction start.
text in image
Exhibit 17: We now are tracking 3 new reactors that begun construction and 1 new grid connection 2025 global reactor online, construction start and shutdown changes (+ ) Capacity Country Construction Start Date First Grid Connection Net Capacity Reactor Type 2025 Grid Connections Rajasthan-7 India 7/18/2011 3/17/2025 630 MWe PWHR Zhangzhou-2 China 9/4/2020 11/24/2025 1,126 MWe PWR 2025 Construction Starts Leningrad 2-4 Russia 3/20/2025 1,150 MWe PWR Shin Hanul 3, Ulchin 5/28/2025 1,400 MWe PWR Taipingling-3 China 6/10/2025 1,209 MWe PWR Xiangshan Jinqimen 1 China 8/19/2025 1,250 MWe PWR Sanao-3 China 11/19/2025 1,200 MWe PWR (- ) Capacity Country Shutdown Date First Grid Connection Net Capacity Reactor Type 2025 Permanent Shutdowns Doel-1 Belgium 2/14/2025 8/28/1974 445 MWe PWR Maanshan-2 China, Taiwan 5/18/2025 2/25/1985 938 MWe PWR as of 12/9/2025 Source: PRIS, WNA, WNN, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
quoting @zerohedge
This brings the total nuclear reactors under construction in China to 30, followed by India (6) and Russia (5). There are no new nuclear reactors under construction in the US currently.
A bar chart titled 'Exhibit 18' displays the number of nuclear reactors under construction by country, with China leading at 30, followed by India at 6 and Russia at 5. The data is sourced from PRIS and compiled by Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research as of December 9, 2025.
text in image
Exhibit 18: 1 new reactor started construction in the month of November # of nuclear reactors under construction 35 30 30 25 20 15 10 5 6 5 4 4 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 China* India Russia Egypt Turkey Korea* Bangladesh Japan Ukraine United Kingdom Argentina Brazil Iran Slovak Pakistan 0 as of 12/9/25 | * indicates month over month changes Source: PRIS, Data compiled by Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, WNA, WNN
quoting @zerohedge
One year later China is up to 40 reactors under construction, India and Russia are also up. The US is still at 0
A bar chart displays the number of nuclear reactors under construction by country, showing China with a dominant lead of 40 units. India and Russia follow with significantly lower numbers of 8 and 7 respectively, while many other nations have only one or two.
text in image
Exhibit 2: 2 new reactors (China) have been added to total reactors under construction # of nuclear reactors under construction 40 China 8 India 7 Russia 4 Egypt 4 Türkiye 4 South Korea 2 Bangladesh 2 Japan 2 Ukraine 2 United Kingdom 1 Argentina 1 Brazil 1 Iran 1 Pakistan 1 Hungary 1 Canada as of 11/9/2026 Source: World Nuclear Association, Data compiled by Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research
♥ 995 · ↻ 220
This is an absolute masterpiece. 10/10. No notes
♥ 40.7k · ↻ 6600 · retweeted by @steipete
The Caine Prize, which awarded its top prize this year to a story Pangram classifies as almost entirely AI-generated, conducted an investigation and found "no evidence" of AI use. Strangely, their official statement on Instagram seems to also be blatantly AI-generated.
A screenshot juxtaposing a statement from the Caine Prize defending a winning story against AI allegations with a Pangram AI detection report that flags the text as 99% AI-generated. The left side highlights phrases about evidence and human authorship, while the right side displays a large gauge ind
text in image
AI Detected 280 words scanned Pangram 4.1 We believe this text is mainly AI, with some human-written content. 99% of this text is AI AI percentage could vary Estimated range 95–100% AI text Our best estimate is 99%, with a likely range of 95–100%. Similarity Analysis No Similarity Found The claim was based on a single score from Pangram, an AI detection tool. We took the allegation seriously and launched a formal review within 48 hours. Human-centered. Evidence-led. Thorough. As a Prize built on trust, community, and connection with African writers, we grounded our review in fairness and transparency. We spoke to every person involved and examined the documentary evidence ourselves. Multiple lines of evidence, not a single score. Two rounds of independent digital forensic analysis of the manuscript files. Two detailed interviews with the author. Testimony from the publisher, the poet, and all five judges. A documented file history spanning months of writing. 27 hours of documented editing across all file versions. The metadata shows incremental writing over months, consistent with a researched, revised, human-authored story. Every account aligned. The author's description of his writing process matched the file evidence at every point we could verify. The poet, the publisher, and all five judges independently confirmed the story's authenticity and the depth of its craft. AI detection tools are not reliable arbiters of authorship. These tools are known to produce false positives, particularly for writers from non-Western linguistic traditions. A single detection score, without disclosed methodology, should never be treated as proof.
♥ 1368 · ↻ 96 · retweeted by @KirkegaardEmil
NVIDIA would be wrong to fire Jensen. His marital indiscretions are between him, his wife, and a reprimand from the board. Have some proportionality.
What a waste.
♥ 9881 · ↻ 396
Polymarket Perps@Poly_PerpsFri 1:50am
BREAKING: SpaceX rallies amid growing speculation that Jensen Huang could join forces with Elon Musk.
The image shows Elon Musk in a suit holding a model of a SpaceX Starship rocket, standing next to Jensen Huang who is wearing a black leather jacket with an NVIDIA logo on the chest. The two appear to be looking at something off-camera in what looks like a staged or AI-generated photograph.
The image is a candlestick chart from Polymarket showing the price movement of a trading pair labeled SPCX, which features the X logo. The chart displays a sharp vertical spike in value around 9 AM, pushing the price up to $144.98.
text in image
Perps / Stocks / SPCX SPCX $144.98 ▲ $3.99 (2.83%) Polymarket 148.00 146.00 144.98 144.00 142.00 140.00 138.00 +$134 +$22 +$1,341 +$600 7 AM 8 AM 9 AM Trading Is Risky. 100% Loss Can Occur. US Users: Featured Market Not Available; Informational Use Only. QTs may include commentary from Polymarket partners.
+1 more in @Poly_Perps's thread
quoting @Poly_Perps
Will you look at that
The image is a screenshot of a conversation on X between the account zerohedge and Elon Musk, where zerohedge asks Elon to hire Jensen and Musk replies that it would be an honor.
text in image
zerohedge @zerohedge · 15h Elon please hire Jensen 726 1.6K 45K 3.4M X Elon Musk @elonmusk · 13h That would be an honor 3.7K 7.5K 117K 6M
♥ 4806 · ↻ 359
quoting @ATLCWorker
If you have a refrigerator with food, you are rich enough to be afraid of socialism.
♥ 31.0k · ↻ 2861 · retweeted by @theonevortex
replying to @barbarismcrit
@barbarismcrit “Most millennials will never own a home” Most millennials currently own a home.
A line chart titled 'Generational Homeownership Rates, 1985-2022' tracks the homeownership percentages for Silent, Baby Boomer, Generation X, and Millennial cohorts over time. The chart shows that as of 2022, Millennial homeownership stands at 51.5%, significantly lower than previous generations but
text in image
Generational Homeownership Rates, 1985-2022 100% Silent 77.8% Baby Boomer 76.8% 69.7% Generation X Millennial 51.5% 40% 20% 0% 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Source: Current Population Survey, Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 1985 - 2022 Apartment List
quoting @LocalPizzaDeliv
Emilia ⚔️🪡🕯️@aerendianThu 4:10pm
Only 51% of 30-45 year olds owning a home is catastrophic btw
♥ 3292 · ↻ 138
Tarric Brooker aka Avid Commentator 🇦🇺@AvidCommentatorThu 4:37pm
This is why we can't have nice things....
A line chart compares cumulative productivity growth in Australia and the United States from 2016 to 2026, showing the US rising sharply to 24.1% while Australia remains nearly flat at 1.0%. The graph includes a logo for Burnout Economics and cites ABS and FRED as data sources.
text in image
Cumulative Productivity Growth Since Q2 2016 - Australia Vs U.S 24.0% 22.0 20.0 18.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 United States 24.1% Australia 1.0% Source: Calculated based on data from ABS, FRED • Created with Datawrapper BURNOUTECONOMICS.COM
♥ 500 · ↻ 46
quoting @MatthewStadlen
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormackThu 8:39pm
Unfortunately Matthew will use 0.7% as spin without telling you the important details behind this. Headline - it’s ugly. Government consumption and investment was roughly 80% of the net increase: - Government services: +£0.96bn - Government investment: +£3.46bn - Total GDP increase: £5.55bn In the private sector computing grew 4.4%, but this is on the back of an AI and tech boom, in other words, it would have happened anyway. Things that government policy directly impacts: - Construction fell 0.7% - Education fell 0.5% - Food & beverage services fell 1.9% Anyone with half a brain knows that GDP growth alone doesn’t prove higher productivity or better living standards. We absolutely need sustained growth in the private sector and productivity. We’re fucked if we rely on increased state spending. This is how countries destroy themselves. But this is what socialists want, an entirely managed economy and dependent class.
♥ 826 · ↻ 193